Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36215073›Full record

ArticleJAMA network open2022

Trends in Obesity Prevalence Among Patients Enrolled in Clinical Trials for Obesity-Related Cancers, 1986 to 2016.

Riha Vaidya, Cathee Till, Heather Greenlee, Dawn L Hershman, Joseph M Unger

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in JAMA network open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Riha VaidyaSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.
Cathee TillSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.
Heather GreenleeFred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, Washington.
Dawn L HershmanColumbia University, New York, New York.
Joseph M UngerSWOG Statistics and Data Management Center, Seattle, Washington.

Funding

SWOG NCORP Research BaseUG1CA189974 · NCI · THE HOPE FOUNDATION · PI CHARLES D. BLANKE, DAWN HERSHMAN · 2014 to 2026
$80.6M
NCI NIH HHS UG1 CA189974
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Importance: Obesity rates have risen in the United States since the 1980s. Several studies have shown links between obesity and the incidence of specific cancer types, but none have systematically examined obesity prevalence at the time of cancer diagnosis, or among clinical trial participants, all of which may affect clinical outcomes. Objective: To examine the prevalence of obesity and, separately, overweight and obesity over 30 years among patients with cancer enrolled in clinical treatment trials for obesity-related cancers; and to compare trends with corresponding trends in the US. Design, Setting, and Participants: This cohort study examined clinical treatment trials for obesity-related cancers conducted by the SWOG Cancer Research Network at community and academic sites. Participants included adult patients enrolled in phase 2 or phase 3 clinical treatment trials in obesity-related cancers between 1986 and 2016. Statistical analysis was performed from June 2020 to July 2022. Exposures: Year of enrollment to a clinical trial. Main Outcomes and Measures: Prevalence of obesity (body mass index [BMI] ≥ 30) and overweight or obesity (BMI > 25) at the time of clinical trial enrollment. Multivariable logistic regression analysis, adjusted for demographic and clinical factors, was used to analyze patient height and weight collected at clinical trial enrollment. Results: Among 23 926 patients (median [IQR] age, 58 [51-66] years; 17 594 [73.5%] female; 969 [4.0%] Hispanic, 2173 [9.1%] non-Hispanic Black, 19 890 [83.1%] non-Hispanic White) enrolled between 1986 and 2016, unadjusted obesity rates increased from 23.5% (in 1986 to 1990 [n = 657]) to 42.3% (in 2011 to 2016 [n = 836]). There was an increasing linear trend in obesity (odds ratio [OR], 1.23 for each 5-year increase; 95% CI, 1.21-1.26; P < .001), which persisted after covariate adjustment for demographic and clinical characteristics. Findings were consistent for the combined prevalence of overweight and obesity. The observed overall increasing trend in obesity prevalence from 1999-2000 to 2015-2016 was greater in trial patients (21.3% [SE = 0.7] to 49.1% [SE = 1.6]) than in US adults (30.5% [SE = 1.5] to 39.6% [SE = 1.6]) (P for trend = .03), but was similar to US cancer survivors (18.9% [SE = 1.9] to 42.2% [SE = 2.1]; P for trend = .31). Conclusions and Relevance: This cohort study found that patients with cancer and obesity are currently well-represented in cancer clinical trials, increasing confidence that trial findings are generalizable to patients with obesity in clinical practice. Availability of data on height and weight at diagnosis through cancer registries will enable a more rigorous analysis of obesity prevalence among patients with cancer.

Indexed as

NeoplasmsOverweightAdultBody Mass IndexCohort StudiesFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedObesityPrevalenceUnited States

Identifiers

PMID36215073
PMCPMC9552895

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.