ArticleJournal of community genetics2022
Parents' perspectives on the use of children's facial images for research and diagnosis: a survey.
Article in Journal of community genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed, 4 citations in OpenAlex.
- Ethical Considerations for Clinical Data Sharing in Craniofacial Research: Recommendations From a Multidisciplinary Working Group.The Cleft palate-craniofacial journal : official publication of the American Cleft Palate-Craniofacial Association · 2026Article
- Publishing Identifiable Patient Photographs in the Digital Age: Focus Group Study of Patients, Doctors, and Medical Students.Journal of medical Internet research · 2025Article
- GestaltMatcher Database - A global reference for facial phenotypic variability in rare human diseases.medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences · 2024Article
- GestaltMatcher Database - A global reference for facial phenotypic variability in rare human diseases.Research square · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Computer-aided facial diagnostic tools are valuable emerging technologies for the early detection and initial diagnosis of congenital disorders. These tools require large datasets of facial photographs, especially of infants and children, to identify these disorders and improve classification accuracies. Researchers need to balance this need for larger datasets with patients' privacy rights, needs and preferences. This study aimed to investigate parents' views regarding the collection, storage, use and publication of their children's facial images for research and diagnostic purposes. A total of 151 parents of children with and without congenital disorders completed an online survey evaluating their views on the collection, storage, use and publication of children's facial images for research and diagnosis. Overall, 72.5% of parents would allow researchers to take facial photographs of their children, preferring the images to be stored in a secure database that is not available to the public. Parents of children with congenital disorders were more accepting of researchers taking facial photographs of their children, compared to parents of children without these conditions. Half of the respondents would allow facial photographs of their children to be published in academic journals, without their eyes covered, and this acceptance increased as the proportion of the child's face covered increased. Parents also indicated specific requirements to allow the use of these images in other similar research studies which need to be taken into consideration when planning studies that involve facial analysis research.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.