ReviewNeurosurgical review2022
Current status and outlook of potential applications of biodegradable materials in cerebral vascular stents.
Review in Neurosurgical review, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 6 citations in OpenAlex.
- A Comprehensive Review of Arachnoid Cysts.Cureus · 2025Review
- The Crucial Role of the Blood-Brain Barrier in Neurodegenerative Diseases: Mechanisms of Disruption and Therapeutic Implications.Journal of clinical medicine · 2025Review
- Neuroprotection on ischemic brain injury by MgBioactive materials · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
The treatment of intracranial aneurysms (IAs) has undergone a very significant transformation in recent decades, and endovascular interventions have gradually become one of the most common treatments. As permanent metal stents can cause some degree of long-term damage to patients, biodegradable stent materials are emerging as attractive potential alternatives. By reviewing the current research status and the advantages and disadvantages of existing biodegradable biomaterials, this review expects to provide a valuable reference for subsequent research on biodegradable biomaterials.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.