ArticleJournal of clinical microbiology2022
Performance of the JF5-Based Galactomannoprotein EIA Compared to the Lateral Flow Device and the Galactomannan EIA in Serum and Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid.
Article in Journal of clinical microbiology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Lateral-flow device for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a systematic review and diagnostic meta-analysis.BMC infectious diseases · 2025Pooled it
- The future of fungal diagnostics: What's next in laboratory testing for invasive fungal infection?Medical mycology · 2026Review
- Endothelial system dysregulation underlies keloid development and therapeutic targeting.Frontiers in cell and developmental biology · 2026Review
- Serum antigen tests for the diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis: a retrospective comparison of fiveJournal of clinical microbiology · 2024Article
- Evaluation of the JF5-based Aspergillus galactomannoprotein lateral flow device for diagnosing invasive aspergillosis in cancer patients.European journal of clinical microbiology & infectious diseases : official publication of the European Society of Clinical Microbiology · 2024Article
- Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Early diagnosis of invasive aspergillosis is an important factor to improve survival but remains challenging. The detection of Aspergillus antigens is included in the consensus case definitions of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer and the National Institute of Allergy and Infectious Diseases Mycoses Study Group as a criterion of "probable" invasive aspergillosis. JF5, a mouse IgG3 monoclonal antibody detecting an Aspergillus mannoprotein, has already been implemented as a lateral flow device (LFD). Now, also a JF5-based enzyme-linked immunosorbent assay (EIA) is commercialized (Aspergillus specific galactomannoprotein [GP] EIA, Euroimmun Medizinische Labordiagnostika AG). In this study, we analyzed the diagnostic performance of GP in 63 bronchoalveolar lavage fluid (BALf) samples and 224 serum samples and compared it to performance of the galactomannan (GM) (Platelia Aspergillus enzyme immunoassay (EIA) (Bio-Rad, Marnes-la-Coquette, France)) and the JF5-based LFD (AspLFD; OLM Diagnostics, Newcastle Upon Tyne, United Kingdom). The diagnostic performance of GP and GM correlated well with both having high specificity. With an optimized cutoff threshold for positivity of 0.4-deviating from the 0.5 threshold recommended by the manufacturer-sensitivity of GP in serum is not significantly different than that of GM. However, in BALf sensitivity of GP is significantly less than for GM.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.