Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214462›Full record

ArticleBone & joint research2022

Radiodynamic therapy with acridine orange local administration as a new treatment option for primary and secondary bone tumours.

Yumi Matsuyama, Tomoki Nakamura, Keisuke Yoshida, Tomohito Hagi, Takahiro Iino, Kunihiro Asanuma, Akihiro Sudo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Bone & joint research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 14% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed, 9 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Yumi MatsuyamaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-7393-1864
Tomoki NakamuraDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0002-1099-7436
Keisuke YoshidaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0723-4494
Tomohito HagiDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0001-8763-1515
Takahiro IinoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Kunihiro AsanumaDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.
Akihiro SudoDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, Mie University Graduate School of Medicine, Tsu, Japan.ORCID 0000-0003-0474-4368
Mie University · JP

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsAcridine orange (AO) demonstrates several biological activities. When exposed to low doses of X-ray radiation, AO increases the production of reactive radicals (radiodynamic therapy (AO-RDT)). We elucidated the efficacy of AO-RDT in breast and prostate cancer cell lines, which are likely to develop bone metastases.

methodsWe used the mouse osteosarcoma cell line LM8, the human breast cancer cell line MDA-MB-231, and the human prostate cancer cell line PC-3. Cultured cells were exposed to AO and radiation at various concentrations followed by various doses of irradiation. The cell viability was then measured. In vivo, each cell was inoculated subcutaneously into the backs of mice. In the AO-RDT group, AO (1.0 μg) was locally administered subcutaneously around the tumour followed by 5 Gy of irradiation. In the radiation group, 5 Gy of irradiation alone was administered after macroscopic tumour formation. The mice were killed on the 14th day after treatment. The change in tumour volume by AO-RDT was primarily evaluated.

resultsThe viability of LM8, MDA-MB-231, and PC-3 cells strongly decreased at AO concentration of 1.0 μg/ml and a radiation dose of 5 Gy. In xenograft mouse model, the AO-RDT also showed a strong cytocidal effect on tumour at the backside in osteosarcoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer. AO-RDT treatment was more effective for tumour control than radiotherapy in breast cancer.

conclusionAO-RDT was effective in preventing the proliferation of osteosarcoma, breast cancer, and prostate cancer cell lines in vitro. The reduction in tumour volume by AO-RDT was also confirmed in vivo.Cite this article:

Indexed as

Acridine orangeBone metastasisbone tumoursbreast cancercancersMann-Whitney U testmetastatic bone tumoursmouse modelosteosarcoma cellsprostate cancerRadiodynamic therapyradiotherapyxenograft

Identifiers

PMID36214462
PMCPMC9582865
OpenAlexW4303983021

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.