Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214253›Full record

ReviewThe International journal of eating disorders2022

The potential application of event-related potentials to enhance research on reward processes in eating disorders.

Glen Forester, Lauren M Schaefer, Dorian R Dodd, Jeffrey S Johnson

Open access · greenAbstract readReviewLetter
In one paragraph

Review in The International journal of eating disorders, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.0field-weighted citation impact, top 25% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 6 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Glen ForesterCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-1738-7163
Lauren M SchaeferCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-9907-7598
Dorian R DoddCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.ORCID 0000-0002-5072-3624
Jeffrey S JohnsonCenter for Biobehavioral Research, Sanford Research, Fargo, North Dakota, USA.
Sanford Research · USUniversity of North Dakota · US

Funding

The Neurocognitive Reward Learning Mechanisms of Binge EatingP20GM134969 · NIGMS · SANFORD RESEARCH NORTH · PI WONDERLICH, STEPHEN ARTHUR · 2021 to 2025
$11.5M
Regional Postdoctoral Training Grant in Eating Disorders ResearchT32MH082761 · NIMH · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI CAROL B. PETERSON · 2009 to 2026
$6.2M
NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM134969NIMH NIH HHS T32 MH082761
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

objectiveReward-related processes have been posited as key mechanisms underlying the onset and persistence of eating disorders, prompting a growing body of research in this area. Existing studies have primarily utilized self-report, behavioral, and functional magnetic resonance imaging measures to interrogate reward among individuals with eating disorders. However, limitations inherent in each of these methods (e.g., poor temporal resolution) may obscure distinct neurocognitive reward processes, potentially contributing to underdeveloped models of reward dysfunction within eating disorders. The temporal precision of event-related potentials (ERPs), derived from electroencephalography, may thus offer a powerful complementary tool for elucidating the neurocognitive underpinnings of reward. Indeed, a considerable amount of research in other domains of psychopathology (e.g., depression, substance use disorders), as well as studies investigating food reward among non-clinical samples, highlights the utility of ERPs for probing reward processes. However, no study to date has utilized ERPs to directly examine reward functioning in eating disorders.

methodsIn this paper, we review evidence underscoring the clinical utility of ERP measures of reward, as well as a variety of reward-related tasks that can be used to elicit specific ERP components with demonstrated relevance to reward processing. We then consider the ways in which these tasks/components may be used to help answer a variety of open questions within the eating disorders literature on reward. RESULTS/DISCUSSION: Given the promise of ERP measures of reward to the field of eating disorders, we ultimately hope to spur and guide research in this currently neglected area. PUBLIC SIGNIFICANCE: Abnormalities in reward functioning appear to contribute to eating disorders. Event-related potentials (ERPs) offer temporally precise measures of neurocognitive reward processing and thus may be important tools for understanding the relationship between reward and disordered eating. However, research in this area is currently lacking. This paper attempts to facilitate the use of ERPs to study reward among individuals with eating disorders by reviewing the relevant theories and methods.

Indexed as

Evoked PotentialsFeeding and Eating DisordersAttentionElectroencephalographyHumansRewardeating disordersEEGelectroencephalographyERPsevent-related potentialsreward

Identifiers

PMID36214253
PMCPMC9633412
OpenAlexW4304005538

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.