Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214216›Full record

Trial reportBritish journal of clinical pharmacology2023

Viral clearance, pharmacokinetics and tolerability of ensovibep in patients with mild to moderate COVID-19: A phase 2a, open-label, single-dose escalation study.

Manon L M Prins, Johan L van der Plas, Maurits F J M Vissers, Cécile L Berends, Gaby Tresch, Marianne Soergel, Elena Fernández, Nikita van den Berge, Daniël Duijsings, Christof Zitt and 6 more

Open access · hybridAbstract readRandomized Controlled TrialClinical Trial, Phase II
In one paragraph

Trial report in British journal of clinical pharmacology, 2023. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
1.6field-weighted citation impact, top 18% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Adverse drug reactions associated with COVID-19 management.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2024
    Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

16 authors at 3 institutions in 2 countries.

Manon L M PrinsDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Johan L van der PlasDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Maurits F J M VissersCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-7199-7301
Cécile L BerendsCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.ORCID 0000-0001-8721-4682
Gaby TreschMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Marianne SoergelMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Elena FernándezMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Nikita van den BergeMunicipal Health Services (GGD Hollands Midden), Leiden, The Netherlands.
Daniël DuijsingsViroclinics Biosciences B.V., Rotterdam, The Netherlands.
Christof ZittMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Vaia StavropoulouMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Maya ZimmermannMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Roxana F DrakeMolecular Partners AG, Schlieren, Switzerland.
Jacobus BurggraafCentre for Human Drug Research, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Geert H GroeneveldDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Ingrid M C KamerlingDepartment of Infectious Diseases, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
Leiden University Medical Center · NLMolecular Partners (Switzerland) · CHViroclinics Biosciences (Netherlands) · NL

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimTo assess viral clearance, pharmacokinetics, tolerability and symptom evolution following ensovibep administration in symptomatic COVID-19 outpatients.

methodsIn this open-label, first-in-patient study a single dose of either 225 mg (n = 6) or 600 mg (n = 6) of ensovibep was administered intravenously in outpatients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19 symptoms. Pharmacokinetic profiles were determined (90-day period). Pharmacodynamic assessments consisted of viral load (qPCR and cultures) and symptom questionnaires. Immunogenicity against ensovibep and SARS-CoV-2-neutralizing activity were determined. Safety and tolerability were assessed throughout a 13-week follow-up.

resultsBoth doses showed similar pharmacokinetics (first-order) with mean half-lives of 14 (SD 5.0) and 13 days (SD 5.7) for the 225- and 600-mg groups, respectively. Pharmacologically relevant serum concentrations were maintained in all subjects for at least 2 weeks postdose, regardless of possible immunogenicity against ensovibep. Viral load changes from baseline at day 15 were 5.1 (SD 0.86) and 5.3 (SD 2.2) log

conclusionSingle-dose intravenous administration of 225 or 600 mg of ensovibep appeared safe and well tolerated in patients with mild-to-moderate COVID-19. Ensovibep showed favourable pharmacokinetics in patients and the pharmacodynamic results warrant further research in a larger phase 2/3 randomized-controlled trail.

Indexed as

COVID-19Antibodies, ViralDouble-Blind MethodHumansRecombinant Fusion ProteinsSARS-CoV-2Antibodies, ViralensovibepRecombinant Fusion ProteinsCOVID-19medication safetypharmacodynamicspharmacokineticsvirology

Identifiers

PMID36214216
PMCPMC9875039
OpenAlexW4303986184

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.