Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214166›Full record

ArticleScandinavian journal of public health2024

The Parent Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ-Parent). Adaptation and validity testing with parents of children with epilepsy.

Astrid K Wahl, Åsmund Hermansen, Merete B Tschamper, Richard H Osborne, Sølvi Helseth, Rita Jacobsen, Marie H Larsen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scandinavian journal of public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Astrid K WahlFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.ORCID 0000-0002-5545-5710
Åsmund HermansenFaculty of Social Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
Merete B TschamperFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.
Richard H OsborneCentre of Global Health and Equity, School of Health Sciences, Swinburne University of Technology, Hawthorn, Australia.
Sølvi HelsethFaculty of Health Sciences, Oslo Metropolitan University, Norway.
Rita JacobsenLovisenberg Diaconal University College, Oslo, Norway.
Marie H LarsenFaculty of Medicine, Institute of Health and Society, Department of Interdisciplinary Health Sciences, University of Oslo, Norway.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

aimsThe aim of this study was to adapt the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ) in English and Norwegian for use with parents.

methodsThe research group evaluated all HLQ items and, where relevant, modified them to refocus the attribution of care to that of a child by a parent. Five cognitive interviews with parents were undertaken to gain a detailed depiction of the meanings and processes they used to respond to the HLQ items. Assessment of the psychometric properties of the revised HLQ was undertaken using data from a cross-sectional survey of 254 parents of children with epilepsy. Analysis included internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha) and confirmatory factor analysis (CFA).

resultsSome 22 out of 44 items and the names of three domains were modified (e.g. attribution changed from 'me' to 'my child'). Cognitive interviews indicated that parents interpreted the HLQ-Parent items in the way intended. All but three factor loadings were high to acceptable. All nine HLQ scales showed satisfactory to good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha 0.70 to 0.87). When fitting one-factor CFA models, correlated residuals were required for four scales to generate an acceptable fit. One scale, '8. Ability to find good health information', required inclusion of two correlated residuals to generate an acceptable CFA model fit, indicating that further work on this scale is warranted.

conclusionsThe results from both the adaptation process and the CFA analysis supported the relevance, understanding and theoretical structure of the instrument in a parental context.

Indexed as

EpilepsyHealth LiteracyChildCross-Sectional StudiesHumansParentsPsychometricsReproducibility of ResultsSurveys and Questionnairesadaptationcognitive interviewsconfirmatory factor analysisepilepsyHealth Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ)Parental health literacy

Identifiers

PMID36214166
PMCPMC10845827

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.