Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214131›Full record

ReviewCirculation2022

Leveraging Implementation Science for Cardiovascular Health Equity: A Scientific Statement From the American Heart Association.

Nathalie Moise, Crystal W Cené, Rachel G Tabak, Deborah R Young, Katherine T Mills, Utibe R Essien, Cheryl A M Anderson, Francisco Lopez-Jimenez, American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Hypertension; and Stroke Council

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Circulation, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 59 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
59citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

59 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. From Efficacy to Effectiveness: When Proven Therapies Fail.Circulation. Population health and outcomes · 2026
    Article
  8. Review
  9. Diversifying the Interventional Cardiology Workforce: Why It Matters and How to Achieve It.Journal of the Society for Cardiovascular Angiography & Interventions · 2026
    Review
  10. Article
  11. Review
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nathalie Moise
Crystal W Cené
Rachel G Tabak
Deborah R Young
Katherine T Mills
Utibe R Essien
Cheryl A M Anderson
Francisco Lopez-Jimenez
American Heart Association Council on Epidemiology and Prevention; Council on Hypertension; and Stroke Council

Funding

An Information tecHnology approach to implEmenting depression treAtment in caRdiac patienTs: [iHeart Trial]R01HL141609 · NHLBI · COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY HEALTH SCIENCES · PI MOISE, NATHALIE · 2018 to 2022
$4.0M
Access, Quality and Equity of Anticoagulants in Veterans with Atrial FibrillationIK2HX003176 · VA · VETERANS HEALTH ADMINISTRATION · PI Utibe R. Essien · 2021 to 2026
–
HSRD VA IK2 HX003176NHLBI NIH HHS R01 HL141609
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Reducing cardiovascular disease disparities will require a concerted, focused effort to better adopt evidence-based interventions, in particular, those that address social determinants of health, in historically marginalized populations (ie, communities excluded on the basis of social identifiers like race, ethnicity, and social class and subject to inequitable distribution of social, economic, physical, and psychological resources). Implementation science is centered around stakeholder engagement and, by virtue of its reliance on theoretical frameworks, is custom built for addressing research-to-practice gaps. However, little guidance exists for how best to leverage implementation science to promote cardiovascular health equity. This American Heart Association scientific statement was commissioned to define implementation science with a cardiovascular health equity lens and to evaluate implementation research that targets cardiovascular inequities. We provide a 4-step roadmap and checklist with critical equity considerations for selecting/adapting evidence-based practices, assessing barriers and facilitators to implementation, selecting/using/adapting implementation strategies, and evaluating implementation success. Informed by our roadmap, we examine several organizational, community, policy, and multisetting interventions and implementation strategies developed to reduce cardiovascular disparities. We highlight gaps in implementation science research to date aimed at achieving cardiovascular health equity, including lack of stakeholder engagement, rigorous mixed methods, and equity-informed theoretical frameworks. We provide several key suggestions, including the need for improved conceptualization and inclusion of social and structural determinants of health in implementation science, and the use of adaptive, hybrid effectiveness designs. In addition, we call for more rigorous examination of multilevel interventions and implementation strategies with the greatest potential for reducing both primary and secondary cardiovascular disparities.

Indexed as

Health EquityAmerican Heart AssociationHealthcare DisparitiesHumansImplementation ScienceSocial ClassAHA Scientific Statementscardiovascular diseaseshealth equityimplementation science

Identifiers

PMID36214131
PMCPMC12281102

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.