Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36214114›Full record

ReviewBJPsych open2022

Effects of the COVID-19 pandemic and previous pandemics, epidemics and economic crises on mental health: systematic review.

Michaela Asper, Walter Osika, Christina Dalman, Elin Pöllänen, Otto Simonsson, Pär Flodin, Anna Sidorchuk, Laura Marchetti, Fatima Awil, Rosa Castro and 1 more

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in BJPsych open, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 29 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

11 authors at 2 institutions in 2 countries.

Michaela AsperDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Walter OsikaCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Christina DalmanDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Elin PöllänenDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Otto SimonssonDepartment of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Pär FlodinDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.
Anna SidorchukCentre for Psychiatry Research, Department of Clinical Neuroscience, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden; and Stockholm Health Care Services, Region Stockholm, Sweden.
Laura MarchettiMental Health Europe, Belgium.
Fatima AwilMental Health Europe, Belgium.
Rosa CastroFederation of European Academies of Medicine, Belgium.
Maria E NiemiDepartment of Global Public Health, Karolinska Institutet, Sweden.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5407-6981
Karolinska Institutet · SEEuropean Council · BE

Funding

Horizon 2020 Framework Programme 101016233
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

backgroundA rise in mental illness is expected to follow the COVID-19 pandemic, which has also been projected to lead to a deep global economic recession, further adding to risk factors.

aimsThe aim of this review was to assess the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic and previous pandemics, epidemics and economic crises on mental health.

methodSearches were conducted in PubMed, Web of Science, PsycINFO and Sociological Abstracts. We included studies of all populations exposed to the COVID-19 pandemic, and other similar pandemics/epidemics and economic crises, compared with non-exposed time periods or regions. The outcome was mental health.

resultsThe 174 included studies assessed mental health impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic (87 studies), 2008 economic crisis (84 studies) and severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) epidemic (three studies). Outcomes were divided into affective disorders, suicides, mental healthcare utilisation and other mental health. COVID-19 pandemic studies were of lesser quality than those for the economic crisis or SARS epidemic. Most studies for all exposures showed increases in affective disorders and other mental health problems. For economic crisis exposure, increases in mental healthcare utilisation and suicides were also found, but these findings were mixed for COVID-19 pandemic exposure. This is probably because of quarantine measures affecting help-seeking and shorter follow-ups of studies of COVID-19 pandemic exposure.

conclusionsOur findings highlight the importance of available, accessible and sustainable mental health services. Also, socioeconomically disadvantaged populations should be particular targets of policy interventions during the COVID-19 pandemic.

Indexed as

anxiety disordersCOVID-19depressive disordersepidemiologysuicide

Identifiers

PMID36214114
PMCPMC9551492
OpenAlexW4303980185

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.