Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213917›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in psychiatry2022

The impact of cannabis legalization for recreational purposes on youth: A narrative review of the Canadian experience.

Dafna Sara Rubin-Kahana, Jean-François Crépault, Justin Matheson, Bernard Le Foll

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in psychiatry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
8.0field-weighted citation impact, top 2% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 47 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. PET imaging of FAAH in chronic Cannabis users: longitudinal assessment during short-term abstinence.Neuropsychopharmacology : official publication of the American College of Neuropsychopharmacology · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Should cannabis self-cultivation be part of a public health‒oriented legalization policy framework?Canadian journal of public health = Revue canadienne de sante publique · 2024
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Why are the police against drug policy liberalisation?Nordisk alkohol- & narkotikatidskrift : NAT · 2023
    Article
  16. Observational
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. TheJournal of psychiatry & neuroscience : JPN
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.

Dafna Sara Rubin-KahanaChild and Youth Mental Health Division, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Jean-François CrépaultCommunications and Partnerships, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Justin MathesonTranslational Addiction Research Laboratory, Centre for Addiction and Mental Health, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Bernard Le FollDepartment of Psychiatry, Faculty of Medicine, University of Toronto, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Centre for Addiction and Mental Health · CAPublic Health Ontario · CAUniversity of Toronto · CA

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cannabis legalization for non-medical purposes (subsequently referred to as "cannabis legalization" or "legalization") took place in Canada in October 2018. One of the federal government's stated goals with cannabis legalization was to protect Canadian youth from cannabis-related harms. The main objective of this narrative review is to describe the impact of cannabis legalization on Canadian youth. To that end, we discuss the regulation of the Canadian cannabis market, outline changes in the epidemiology and parameters of cannabis use (modes of use, potency of cannabis) among youth, and discuss prevention and education initiatives related to cannabis. The Canadian model differs from other jurisdictions that legalized recreational cannabis use, especially with regard to a higher degree of government regulation of the cannabis market. Another difference is the development and endorsement of lower-risk cannabis use guidelines to educate the public and health professionals. The results available for this review cover only 3 years post-legalization. Cannabis legalization in Canada brought an apparent increase in use among Canadian older than 25. However, results for youth are mixed, with the majority of studies showing no pronounced increase. Notably, the trend of a decrease in adolescents' cannabis use seen pre-legalization may have reversed. Emerging evidence also suggests that cannabis-related hospitalizations and emergency department visits among Canadian youth may have increased due to cannabis legalization. Data about changes in the age of initiation, the influence of legalization on sex and gender, and race/ethnicity are limited, with evidence suggesting that the age of initiation slightly increased. So far, there is limited data about the impact of cannabis legalization on Canadian youth. Further long-term monitoring and research to assess the effects of cannabis legalization on Canadian youth.

Indexed as

adolescentsCanadacannabis (marijuana)cannabis policylegalizationyouth

Identifiers

PMID36213917
PMCPMC9539831
OpenAlexW4296840986

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.