ArticleJournal of the West African College of Surgeons
Comparative Study of the Umbilical Artery Doppler Indices of Healthy and Growth-Restricted Foetuses in Lagos.
Article in Journal of the West African College of Surgeons. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- The risk of late-onset fetal growth restriction and unfavorable neonatal outcomes among fetuses within the 10th-25th weight percentile: a prospective cohort study.Maternal health, neonatology and perinatology · 2026Article
- Relationship Between Adverse Neonatal Outcomes and Diastolic Deceleration Area on Fetal MCA Doppler in Patients with Late Fetal Growth Restriction.Sisli Etfal Hastanesi tip bulteni · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim of the Study: This study compared the umbilical artery Doppler indices (UADI) in normal and foetal growth-restricted (FGR) foetuses to determine the relationship between the UADI and pregnancy outcomes. Materials and Methods: This was a case-control study that recruited one hundred and eighty pregnant women comprising 90 with FGR pregnancies and 90 with normal pregnancies. Foetal biometric parameters and UADI were measured in all the participants. The UADI and clinical outcomes (preterm delivery, birth weight, perinatal death, etc.) of the normal and FGR foetuses were compared. Results: The mean estimated foetal weights of the FGR pregnancies (subjects) and normal pregnancies (controls) were 2.76 ± 0.66 kg and 3.62 ± 0.37 kg, respectively ( Conclusion: Foetuses with FGR showed significantly higher quantitative Doppler indices (increased RI, PI, SD ratio), and a higher prevalence of abnormal umbilical artery waveform pattern (qualitative) than the healthy foetuses (controls).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.