Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213725›Full record

ArticleTherapeutic advances in gastroenterology2022

Evaluation of the safety profile of endoscopic pyloromyotomy by G-POEM: a French multicenter study.

Florian Baret, Jeremie Jacques, Mathieu Pioche, Jeremie Albouys, Véronique Vitton, Geoffroy Vanbiervliet, Antoine Debourdeau, Marc Barthet, Jean-Michel Gonzalez

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Therapeutic advances in gastroenterology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
8citing papers in PubMed
3.1field-weighted citation impact, top 8% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

8 citing papers in PubMed, 16 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
  8. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 6 institutions in 1 country.

Florian BaretService d'Hépato-Gastro-Entérologie, CHU Nord, Chemin des Bourrely, Marseille 13015, France.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7460-5190
Jeremie JacquesService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
Mathieu PiocheService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Edouard Herriot, Lyon, France.
Jeremie AlbouysService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Dupuytren, Limoges, France.
Véronique VittonService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Nord, Marseille, France.
Geoffroy VanbiervlietService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Archet 2, Nice, France.
Antoine DebourdeauService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Saint Eloi, Montpellier, France.
Marc BarthetService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Nord, Marseille, France.
Jean-Michel GonzalezService de Gastroentérologie, CHU Nord, Marseille, France.
Hôpital Nord · FRSociété Française d'Endoscopie Digestive · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Montpellier · FRCentre Hospitalier Universitaire de Nice · FRHôpital Edouard Herriot · FRXLIM · FR

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Gastric per oral endoscopic esophageal myotomy (G-POEM) is a promising procedure to treat refractory gastroparesis. The safety profile of G-POEM is an important topic because gastroparesis is a functional pathology, with a procedure whose effectiveness is between 50 and 65% depending on the studies. Objectives: We present this retrospective multicenter study, with the aim of establishing a safety profile, focusing on serious adverse events (AEs). Design: This was a multicenter observational cohort study conducted in five French expert centers. Methods: All patients who underwent G-POEM for refractory gastroparesis between 2015 and 2021 were included for analysis. AEs were classified into per endoscopic, early postoperative, and late postoperative, up to 1 month. Their severity was assessed using Dindo-Clavien and American Society for Gastrointestinal Endoscopy classification. The primary objective was to evaluate the rate of G-POEM severe AEs. Secondary objectives were to document other postoperative AEs, and to identify predictive factors. Results: In all, 217 patients were included: 81 men and 136 women, mean age 52 ± 17 years. The average procedural time was 44 ± 14 min (12-78). The average hospital stay was 3.7 ± 2.3 days. The AEs rate classified as Clavien-Dindo ⩾3 was 0.4% (one delayed bleeding requiring blood transfusion and endoscopic management). There were no deaths or patients admitted to intensive care unit. The rates of mucosotomy and capnoperitoneum were 3.7 and 1.8%, respectively, without clinical consequences. Most patients (81.5%) did not experience any AE. Three cases of dumping syndrome occurred, quickly managed by dietary measures. Conclusion: Our study confirms the safety of G-POEM with less than 0.5% of serious AEs, medically managed. This outcome makes this a procedure to have a good benefit-risk ratio.

Indexed as

gastroparesisG-POEMsevere complications

Identifiers

PMID36213725
PMCPMC9536103
OpenAlexW4304115518

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.