Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213677›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2022

Current approaches for the regeneration and reconstruction of ocular surface in dry eye.

Vimal Kishor Singh, Pallavi Sharma, Uttkarsh Kumar Sharma Vaksh, Ramesh Chandra

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
2.4field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 12 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Article
  7. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Vimal Kishor SinghDepartment of Biomedical Engineering, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Pallavi SharmaTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Noida, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Uttkarsh Kumar Sharma VakshTissue Engineering and Regenerative Medicine Research Lab, Department of Biomedical Engineering, Amity School of Engineering and Technology, Amity University, Gurgaon, Haryana, India.
Ramesh ChandraInstitute of Nanomedical Sciences, University of Delhi, Delhi, India.
Amity University · INUniversity of Delhi · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Significant research revealed the preocular tear film composition and regulations that remain vital for maintaining Ocular surface functional integrity. Inflammation triggered by many factors is the hallmark of Ocular surface disorders or dry eyes syndrome (DES). The tear deficiencies may lead to ocular surface desiccation, corneal ulceration and/or perforation, higher rates of infectious disease, and the risk of severe visual impairment and blindness. Clinical management remains largely supportive, palliative, and frequent, lifelong use of different lubricating agents. However, few advancements such as punctal plugs, non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs, and salivary gland autografts are of limited use. Cell-based therapies, tissue engineering, and regenerative medicine, have recently evolved as long-term cures for many diseases, including ophthalmic diseases. The present article focuses on the different regenerative medicine and reconstruction/bioengineered lacrimal gland formation strategies reported so far, along with their limiting factors and feasibility as an effective cure in future.

Indexed as

biomaterialsdry eyeslacrimal glandorganoidsscaffoldsSjögren's syndromestem cellstear film

Identifiers

PMID36213677
PMCPMC9544815
OpenAlexW4297009089

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.