ArticleFrontiers in medicine2022
Lateral elbow tendinopathy and artificial intelligence: Binary and multilabel findings detection using machine learning algorithms.
Article in Frontiers in medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
11 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.
- The implementation of artificial intelligence in upper extremity surgery: a systematic review.Frontiers in artificial intelligence · 2025Pooled it
- The use of artificial intelligence in musculoskeletal ultrasound: a systematic review of the literature.La Radiologia medica · 2024Pooled it
- Integrating Focused Shockwave Therapy into Rehabilitation for Groin Pain Syndrome: A Prospective Study in Soccer Players.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Machine and deep learning models for ligament injury recognition: a systematic review and meta-analysis of imaging and novel diagnostic techniques.EFORT open reviews · 2026Article
- Noninvasive prediction of failure of the conservative treatment in lateral epicondylitis by clinicoradiological features and elbow MRI radiomics based on interpretable machine learning: a multicenter cohort study.Journal of orthopaedic surgery and research · 2025Article
- Data-driven identification of metabolic and cardiovascular biomarkers in high-altitude workers: a machine learning approach.Frontiers in public health · 2025Observational
- Lactate-related gene signatures as prognostic predictors and comprehensive analysis of immune profiles in nasopharyngeal carcinoma.Journal of translational medicine · 2024Article
- A nomogram for predicting lymphovascular invasion in lung adenocarcinoma: a retrospective study.BMC pulmonary medicine · 2024Article
- Focal Versus Combined Focal Plus Radial Extracorporeal Shockwave Therapy in Lateral Elbow Tendinopathy: A Retrospective Study.Journal of functional morphology and kinesiology · 2024Article
- Deep learning models for tendinopathy detection: a systematic review and meta-analysis of diagnostic tests.EFORT open reviews · 2024Article
- Advances in Ultrasound-Guided Surgery and Artificial Intelligence Applications in Musculoskeletal Diseases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors at 4 institutions in 3 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Ultrasound (US) is a valuable technique to detect degenerative findings and intrasubstance tears in lateral elbow tendinopathy (LET). Machine learning methods allow supporting this radiological diagnosis. Aim: To assess multilabel classification models using machine learning models to detect degenerative findings and intrasubstance tears in US images with LET diagnosis. Materials and methods: A retrospective study was performed. US images and medical records from patients with LET diagnosis from January 1st, 2017, to December 30th, 2018, were selected. Datasets were built for training and testing models. For image analysis, features extraction, texture characteristics, intensity distribution, pixel-pixel co-occurrence patterns, and scales granularity were implemented. Six different supervised learning models were implemented for binary and multilabel classification. All models were trained to classify four tendon findings (hypoechogenicity, neovascularity, enthesopathy, and intrasubstance tear). Accuracy indicators and their confidence intervals ( Results: A total of 30,007 US images (4,324 exams, 2,917 patients) were included in the analysis. The RF model presented the highest mean values in the area under the curve (AUC), sensitivity, and also specificity by each degenerative finding in the binary classification. The AUC and sensitivity showed the best performance in intrasubstance tear with 0.991 [95% Conclusion: Machine learning algorithms based on US images with LET presented high diagnosis accuracy. Mainly the random forest model shows the best performance in binary and multilabel classifiers, particularly for intrasubstance tears.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.