Trial reportContrast media & molecular imaging2022
Investigation of the Effect of Oral Implant Surgery on Clinical Treatment and Oral Function of Patients with Dentition Loss.
Trial report in Contrast media & molecular imaging, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Investigation of the Effect of Oral Implant Surgery on Clinical Treatment and Oral Function of Patients with Dentition Loss.Contrast media & molecular imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-07-19Concerns/Issues about Data · Concerns/Issues about Results and/or Conclusions · Concerns/Issues about Referencing/Attributions · Concerns/Issues about Peer Review · Informed/Patient Consent - None/Withdrawn · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Lack of IRB/IACUC Approval and/or Compliance · Paper Mill · Computer-Aided Content or Computer-Generated Content · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions · · See also: https://pubpeer.com/publications/A16B3FD1D5193C391DE1CDC7BD7752
- Retracted
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
In order to investigate the effect of oral implant surgery on clinical treatment and oral function of patients with dentition loss, a total of 118 patients with dentition loss in the Department of Stomatology of our hospital from January 2019 to January 2022 are retrospectively analyzed. They are randomly divided into the conventional group and the implant group. The conventional group is treated with conventional dentition restoration, and the implant group is treated with oral implant restoration. The repair efficiency of the two groups is compared. The swallowing function of the 2 groups is assessed by Standard Swallowing Assessment (SSA) table before and after treatment. Self-rating depression scale (SDS) and self-rating anxiety scale (SAS) are used to compare the negative emotions of the two groups before and after treatment. Experimental results show that the total effective rate of the implant group is significantly higher than that of the conventional group, but no invalid cases occurred in the two groups after treatment.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.