Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213544›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in neuroinformatics2022

A domain adaptation benchmark for T1-weighted brain magnetic resonance image segmentation.

Parisa Saat, Nikita Nogovitsyn, Muhammad Yusuf Hassan, Muhammad Athar Ganaie, Roberto Souza, Hadi Hemmati

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in neuroinformatics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Biomedizinische Technik. Biomedical engineering · 2025
    Article
  3. Harmonization of multi-scannerFrontiers in neurology · 2022
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Parisa SaatElectrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Nikita NogovitsynCentre for Depression and Suicide Studies, St. Michael's Hospital, Toronto, ON, Canada.
Muhammad Yusuf HassanElectrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Muhammad Athar GanaieElectrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Roberto SouzaElectrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.
Hadi HemmatiElectrical and Software Engineering, Schulich School of Engineering, University of Calgary, Calgary, AB, Canada.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Accurate brain segmentation is critical for magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) analysis pipelines. Machine-learning-based brain MR image segmentation methods are among the state-of-the-art techniques for this task. Nevertheless, the segmentations produced by machine learning models often degrade in the presence of expected domain shifts between the test and train sets data distributions. These domain shifts are expected due to several factors, such as scanner hardware and software differences, technology updates, and differences in MRI acquisition parameters. Domain adaptation (DA) methods can make machine learning models more resilient to these domain shifts. This paper proposes a benchmark for investigating DA techniques for brain MR image segmentation using data collected across sites with scanners from different vendors (Philips, Siemens, and General Electric). Our work provides labeled data, publicly available source code for a set of baseline and DA models, and a benchmark for assessing different brain MR image segmentation techniques. We applied the proposed benchmark to evaluate two segmentation tasks: skull-stripping; and white-matter, gray-matter, and cerebrospinal fluid segmentation, but the benchmark can be extended to other brain structures. Our main findings during the development of this benchmark are that there is not a single DA technique that consistently outperforms others, and hyperparameter tuning and computational times for these methods still pose a challenge before broader adoption of these methods in the clinical practice.

Indexed as

braindeep learningdomain adaptationmagnetic resonance imagingneuroimagingsegmentation

Identifiers

PMID36213544
PMCPMC9538795

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.