Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213514›Full record

ArticleTranslational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine2022

Effect of Weight Goals on Sitting and Moving During a Worksite Sedentary Time Reduction Intervention.

Krista S Leonard, Junia N de Brito, Miranda L Larouche, Sarah A Rydell, Nathan R Mitchell, Mark A Pereira, Matthew P Buman

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Translational journal of the American College of Sports Medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Krista S LeonardCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Junia N de BritoSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Miranda L LaroucheCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.
Sarah A RydellSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Nathan R MitchellSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Mark A PereiraSchool of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
Matthew P BumanCollege of Health Solutions, Arizona State University, Phoenix, AZ, USA.

Funding

Minnesota Obesity Prevention Training (MnOPT)T32DK083250 · NIDDK · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI KOTZ, CATHERINE M, LASKA, MELISSA N. · 2010 to 2024
$5.1M
Stand & Move at Work II: Effectiveness and ImplementationR01CA250527 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BUMAN, MATTHEW P, PEREIRA, MARK A · 2020 to 2024
$3.3M
Stand and Move at Work: A Group-Randomized TrialR01CA198971 · NCI · ARIZONA STATE UNIVERSITY-TEMPE CAMPUS · PI BUMAN, MATTHEW P, PEREIRA, MARK A · 2015 to 2018
$2.6M
University of MN Building Interdisciplinary Research Careers in Women's HealthK12AR084223 · NIAMS · UNIVERSITY OF MINNESOTA · PI SHARON S ALLEN, Kristen Patricia Mark · 2023 to 2026
$2.2M
NCI NIH HHS R01 CA198971NCI NIH HHS R01 CA250527NIAMS NIH HHS K12 AR084223NIDDK NIH HHS T32 DK083250
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction/Purpose: Although many US adults report trying to lose weight, little research has examined weight loss goals as a motivator for reducing workplace sitting and increasing physical activity. This exploratory analysis examined weight goals and the association with changes in workplace sitting, physical activity, and weight. Methods: Employees ( Results: Generalized linear mixed models revealed that within STAND+, LWG and OWG had similar sitting time through 12 months. However, LWG sat significantly more than OWG at 24 months. Within MOVE+, sitting time decreased after introduction of sit-stand workstations for LWG and OWG, although LWG sat more than OWG. Change in physical activity was minimal and weight remained stable in all groups. Conclusions: Patterns of change in workplace sitting were more favorable in OWG relative to LWG, even in the absence of notable weight change. Expectations of weight loss might be detrimental for reductions in workplace sitting. Interventionists may want to emphasize non-weight health benefits of reducing workplace sitting.

Indexed as

physical activitysedentary timeweightweight goalworkplace

Identifiers

PMID36213514
PMCPMC9534174

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.