Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213497›Full record

ArticlePeerJ2022

Distorted body schema after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction: a 4-month follow up study.

Asall Kim, Eun Joo Yang, Myungki Ji, Jaewon Beom, Chunghwi Yi

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in PeerJ, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Asall KimDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0002-1160-8252
Eun Joo YangDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Daelim Catholic Hospital, Seoul, South Korea.
Myungki JiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.ORCID 0000-0003-3771-8801
Jaewon BeomDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, South Korea.
Chunghwi YiDepartment of Physical Therapy, College of Software and Digital Healthcare Convergence, Yonsei University, Wonju, South Korea.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: After breast cancer, some patients report residual pain-related upper limb disability without physical impairment. Although pain and altered proprioception are known to affect the working body schema (WBS), there is little available evidence investigating the WBS of breast cancer survivors (BrCS). WBS-body representations in the brain-affect the "neuromatrix" that modulates pain sensitivity and the threshold for threatening stimuli. The aim of this study was to investigate whether WBS was disrupted after mastectomy with immediate breast reconstruction (IBR) for breast cancer and whether pain and proprioceptive changes affected WBS. Methods: Thirty-five BrCS participated in the 4-month follow-up study. They were observed at 1 and 4 months postoperatively. The main outcome measures were the left right judgement test (LRJT) results, absolute angle error, pectoralis minor length index (PMI), pain, and Quick-Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand (Q-DASH) score. They were measured at each observation, and parametric tests were performed to identify the nature of WBS. Results: Both the reaction time and accuracy of the hand LRJT were poorer than those of the foot and back LRJT ( Conclusion: To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study providing the nature of WBS after mastectomy with IBR. In this population, it is necessary to postoperatively preserve WBS integrity for pain and upper limb disability.

Indexed as

Breast NeoplasmsMammaplastyBody ImageFemaleFollow-Up StudiesHumansMastectomyPainBreast cancerImplicit motor imageryLeft/right judgementsPainRehabilitationWorking body schema

Identifiers

PMID36213497
PMCPMC9536299

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.