Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213397›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in veterinary science2022

Katalin M Larsen, Melissa DeCicco, Katherine Hood, Andrea J Etter

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in veterinary science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Katalin M LarsenEtter Laboratory, Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Melissa DeCiccoEtter Laboratory, Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Katherine HoodEtter Laboratory, Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.
Andrea J EtterEtter Laboratory, Nutrition and Food Sciences Department, The University of Vermont, Burlington, VT, United States.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

The popularity of backyard chickens has been growing steadily over the past 10 years, with Covid-19 stay at home orders in 2020 yielding an added boost in popularity. Concurrently, cases of salmonellosis from live poultry exposure have also risen. Previous research on backyard chicken owners has focused primarily on urban chicken owners, which may have differing knowledge and biosecurity habits from rural backyard chicken owners. The goal of this study was to investigate the prevalence of

Indexed as

animal husbandrybackyard chickensbiosecurityfood safetyhomesteadingpoultry (chicken)Salmonella enterica

Identifiers

PMID36213397
PMCPMC9536149

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.