Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213386›Full record

ArticleRisk management and healthcare policy2022

Analysis of Current Situation Regarding Scientific Fitness Literacy of Nurses in Sports Medicine Integration.

Juan Liu, Yan Wang, Xiao-Yang Shi, Xin-Yu Liu, Cai-Hong Cui, Liang Qin, Qi-Xuan Wei, Zong-Bao Niu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Risk management and healthcare policy, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Characteristics and associated factors of insomnia in gynecological cancer patients: A cross-sectional study.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors.

Juan LiuDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Yan WangCollege of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Xiao-Yang ShiCollege of Nursing, Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Xin-Yu LiuPlanning and Finance Office, Veterans Affairs Bureau, Lianchi District, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Cai-Hong CuiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Liang QinDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Qi-Xuan WeiDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.
Zong-Bao NiuDepartment of Ultrasound Diagnosis, Affiliated Hospital of Hebei University, Baoding, 071000, People's Republic of China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The present study aims to analyze the current situation of scientific fitness literacy in nurses and provide a basis for all-round strategies for its improvement. Methods: Nurses in tertiary hospitals were conveniently selected as subjects in order to investigate the current situation regarding the scientific fitness literacy of nurses. The selection process was completed via the demographics questionnaire and the adult scale of scientific fitness literacy in sports medicine integration. As the minimum sample size was 5-10 times the number of variables in the study of exploring influencing factors of related variables and using the equation , given 20% of invalid questionnaires, the sample size should be >600 persons. The methods used for statistical analysis were descriptive statistical analysis and the Results: The scientific fitness literacy score in nurses was 110.81 ± 25.04 (relative value: 69.7%); this consisted of 50.85 ± 11.19 (73.7%) for scientific fitness knowledge dimension, 25.99 ± 5.35 (78.8%) for scientific fitness attitude dimension, and 33.97 ± 13.59 (59.6%) for scientific fitness behavior and skill dimension. The results of the independent sample Conclusion: Nurses generally have an above-average level of scientific fitness literacy; this is mainly due to their good cognition and attitude regarding scientific fitness. However, their scientific fitness behaviors and skills are greatly inadequate. They are especially weak in completing WHO's recommended amount of exercise, mastering the cores of sports skills, undergoing a professional assessment before exercise, and developing exercise plans.

Indexed as

literacynursesscientific fitnesssituationsports medicine

Identifiers

PMID36213386
PMCPMC9534151

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.