Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213219›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of integrated care

What are the Clinical and Social Outcomes of Integrated Care for Older People? A Qualitative Systematic Review.

Sara Karacsony, Helga Merl, Jane O'Brien, Hazel Maxwell, Sharon Andrews, Melanie Greenwood, Maryam Rouhi, Damhnat McCann, Christine Stirling

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of integrated care. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Integrating social prescribing in a Canadian regional health system to support healthy aging.Health promotion and chronic disease prevention in Canada : research, policy and practice · 2024
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Sara KaracsonyUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-4198-9559
Helga MerlUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3146-7159
Jane O'BrienUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6504-8422
Hazel MaxwellUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0610-4698
Sharon AndrewsUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-0996-0118
Melanie GreenwoodUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-5840-0750
Maryam RouhiUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3722-5433
Damhnat McCannUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6321-2586
Christine StirlingUniversity of Tasmania, Australia.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2723-8302
University of Tasmania · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Older people with multiple chronic conditions have most to gain from successful integrated care models but there is a need to understand current evidence of outcomes for older people. Methods: A qualitative meta-aggregation method was used for the review. Systematic searching of CINAHL, PubMed (Medline), Web of Science, PsycINFO, Scopus and Cochrane identified an initial 93 papers, of which 27 were reviewed. Studies were selected according to the pre-defined protocol and quality assessed using The Joanna Briggs Institute Critical Appraisal Tools (JBIQARI). Eleven, peer-reviewed, English-language papers published between 2000 to 2020 were included. Results: Thirty-three findings were extracted and aggregated into six categories. Three synthesised statements were identified denoting outcomes of integrated care for older people. These indicate social participation and connectedness for older people and their families; the older person feeling motivated to engage in health goals when their preferences were taken into consideration; and older people experiencing support and wellbeing when a therapeutic relationship with a key worker is established. Discussion and conclusion: There was scant evidence of the older person's voice within included studies and a limited focus on outcomes. Stronger evidence is needed to provide meaningful and robust evaluation of outcomes within integrated care models for the older person.

Indexed as

health care systemsintegrated caremeta-aggregationolder peopleoutcomes

Identifiers

PMID36213219
PMCPMC9504020
OpenAlexW4294877988

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.