ArticleJournal of drug assessment2022
Investigation of potential substandard dry powder inhalers on EU and North African markets - evaluation of the delivered and fine particle doses.
Article in Journal of drug assessment, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed, 1 citations in OpenAlex.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Purpose: Discovery of falsified Symbicort 320/9 Turbohaler identified in the UK in 2013 demonstrated that falsified dry powder inhalers were also present in the European market. This work aimed to investigate the current situation of formoterol-containing dry powder inhalers in Europe and North Africa by assessing their aerodynamic performance profile. Methods: A total of eight registered formoterol-based dry powder inhalers over the European and North African markets were involved in this study, including the reference drug Foradil. Samples were prepared using a multistage liquid impinger (MsLI) and further analyzed by a validated HPLC-UV method to determine the delivered and the fine particle doses (FPDs). This study also examined the impact of freezing-thawing cycles on sample stability in terms of analytical purpose handling. Results: No substandard dry powder inhalers were identified among the medicinal products involved in this work. The delivered dose (DD) of assessed drugs varied from 8.33 to 9.69 µg, while the FPD was between 1.86 and 3.35 µg. As expected, this work confirmed that the capsule composition and the barrier properties of the primary packaging can affect the FPD of dry powder for inhalation use. Conclusions: The FPD of products C and B was, respectively, 17.4 and 14.2% superior to Foradil, products D and H had the closest values compared to the original drug, and product F was 34.5% inferior. Additionally, this work showed that a high FPD can be achieved using HPMC capsules and moisture-impermeable primary packaging.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.