ArticleJournal of physical therapy science2022
Comparison of the effective intensity of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation contralateral to a pain site for analgesia.
Article in Journal of physical therapy science, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
[Purpose] This study aimed to compare the effectiveness of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation contralateral to the pain site for analgesia to identify the effective stimulation intensity. [Participants and Methods] Ten healthy adult females were recruited for the study. The same heat stimulation was applied to the left wrist joint of each participant to induce pain, serving as the control. Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was then randomly administered to the right wrist, corresponding to the same dermatome contralateral to the painful site, at the intensities of comfortable stimulation, pain threshold, and maximum pain. The effect of transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation was assessed using a Visual Analogue Scale and by analysis of heart rate variability. [Results] The Visual Analogue Scale score was significantly lower after stimulation with the maximum pain intensity than that for control, and there were no significant differences among the intensities of comfortable stimulation, pain threshold, and maximum pain. No significant differences were found among the groups in terms of high and low-to-high frequency components. [Conclusion] Transcutaneous electrical nerve stimulation at the maximum pain intensity to the dermatome area contralateral to that of the dorsal pain site of the left wrist was considered effective.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.