ArticleIranian journal of child neurology2021
The Results of Whole Exome Sequencing Performed On Previously Undiagnosed Pediatric Neurology Patients.
Article in Iranian journal of child neurology, 2021. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed, 0 citations in OpenAlex.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: Whole exome sequencing (WES) is a new molecular diagnostic test, used in pediatric medicine, especially pediatric neurology. The diagnostic yield of WES is higher than conventional methods. Therefore, this study aimed to assess the diagnostic yield of WES in a pediatric neurology clinic and to report positive results. Materials & Methods: This retrospective study was performed on patients, presenting to the pediatric neurology clinic of Ghaem Hospital in Mashhad, Iran, between March 2015 and March 2017, with various neurological disabilities and unrevealing workup before WES. The patients' clinical features and molecular diagnoses based on the WES results were reported in this study. Results: The overall diagnostic yield of WES was 82.71% (67/81 patients). Two patients were excluded for the lack of data. Sixty-five patients with pathogenic or possibly pathogenic variants exhibited various abnormalities, including intellectual disability/developmental delay (n=44), seizure (n=27), developmental regression (n=11), myopathy (n=9), microcephaly (n=8), neuropathy (n=2), autism spectrum disorder (n=2), and neuromuscular disease (n=2). Overall, 93.84% of the patients were born to consanguineous parents. Also, 62 patients had an autosomal recessive disorder, and three patients had an autosomal dominant disorder. Conclusion: The present findings indicating the high diagnostic yield of WES, besides the important role of this test in determining the etiology of non-specific and atypical presentations of genetic disorders, support the use of WES in pediatric neurology practice.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.