Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213142›Full record

ArticleEuropean journal of wildlife research2022

Wild boar visits to commercial pig farms in southwest England: implications for disease transmission.

Sonny A Bacigalupo, Linda K Dixon, Simon Gubbins, Adam J Kucharski, Julian A Drewe

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in European journal of wildlife research, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Genomic epidemiology ofFrontiers in veterinary science · 2025
    Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Evaluation of Antibody Tests forVeterinary sciences · 2023
    Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Sonny A BacigalupoRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, AL9 7TA UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1491-2476
Linda K DixonThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey UK.
Simon GubbinsThe Pirbright Institute, Pirbright, Surrey UK.
Adam J KucharskiLondon School of Hygiene & Tropical Medicine, University of London, London, UK.
Julian A DreweRoyal Veterinary College, University of London, Hatfield, AL9 7TA UK.

Funding

Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BB/M009513/1Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007036Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council BBS/E/I/00007037
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Contact between wild animals and farmed livestock may result in disease transmission with huge financial, welfare and ethical consequences. Conflicts between people and wildlife can also arise when species such as wild boar (Sus scrofa) consume crops or dig up pasture. This is a relatively recent problem in England where wild boar populations have become re-established in the last 20 years following a 500-year absence. The aim of this pilot study was to determine if and how often free-living wild boar visited two commercial pig farms near the Forest of Dean in southwest England. We placed 20 motion-sensitive camera traps at potential entry points to, and trails surrounding, the perimeter of two farmyards housing domestic pigs between August 2019 and February 2021, covering a total of 6030 trap nights. Forty wild boar detections were recorded on one farm spread across 27 nights, with a median (range) of 1 (0 to 7) night of wild boar activity per calendar month. Most of these wild boar detections occurred between ten and twenty metres of housed domestic pigs. No wild boar was detected at the other farm. These results confirm wild boar do visit commercial pig farms, and therefore, there is potential for contact and pathogen exchange between wild boar and domestic pigs. The visitation rates derived from this study could be used to parameterise disease transmission models of pathogens common to domestic pigs and wild boars, such as the African swine fever virus, and subsequently to develop mitigation strategies to reduce unwanted contacts.

Indexed as

Camera-trapDisease transmissionInterfacePigWild boar

Identifiers

PMID36213142
PMCPMC9532280

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.