Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36213135›Full record

ArticleThe Lancet regional health. Western Pacific2022

Barriers to depression care among middle-aged and older adults in Taiwan's universal healthcare system.

Ting-Yu Chang, Shih-Cheng Liao, Chia-Ming Chang, Chi-Shin Wu, Wei-Lieh Huang, Juey-Jen Hwang, Chih-Cheng Hsu

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in The Lancet regional health. Western Pacific, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
19citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
4.1field-weighted citation impact, top 6% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

19 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Trial
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Suicide risks among caregivers of patients with depressive disorders.The Journal of international medical research · 2024
    Article
  12. Article
  13. Observational
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Ting-Yu ChangDepartment of Medicine, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Shih-Cheng LiaoDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Chia-Ming ChangDepartment of Psychiatry, Chang Gung Memorial Hospital at Linkou, Tao-Yuan, Taiwan.
Chi-Shin WuNational Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
Wei-Lieh HuangDepartment of Psychiatry, College of Medicine, National Taiwan University, Taipei, Taiwan.
Juey-Jen HwangDivision of Cardiology, Department of Internal Medicine, National Taiwan University Hospital Yun-Lin Branch, Yunlin, Taiwan.
Chih-Cheng HsuNational Center for Geriatrics and Welfare Research, National Health Research Institutes, Miaoli, Taiwan.
National Taiwan University · TWNational Yunlin University of Science and Technology · TWChang Gung Memorial Hospital · TWNational Health Research Institutes · TWNational Taiwan University Hospital · TW

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Barriers to depression care differ across countries, highlighting the importance of identifying gaps in health-service coverage for regional health systems. This study aims to identify the bottlenecks of depression care and associated factors. Methods: We used data from the Taiwan Longitudinal Study on Aging of 2015, included 7675 participants aged 50 years and older. We identified participants with clinically relevant depression using the Center for Epidemiological Studies Depression Scale or Taiwan's National Health Insurance program claims records of depressive disorders. Bottleneck analysis was based on a modified Tanahashi framework with four stages: healthcare accessibility, initial contact, adequate treatment, and effective coverage. Individual factors associated with achieving these stages were estimated using multivariable logistic regression models with multiple imputation. Findings: We identified 1253 patients with clinically relevant depression; 83% perceived it as convenient to access healthcare, but only 27% had initial contact with health services, 16% received adequate coverage, and 11% achieved effective treatment. In terms of factors associated with initial contact, being female, married, or retired/unemployed; having a high education level, social group engagement, or self-reported diabetes mellitus; exercising regularly; and participating in social leisure activities were associated with increasing contact. Those with alcohol use had a low likelihood of treatment. Interpretation: Initial contact constitutes the primary bottleneck of depression care in Taiwan. Improving mental health literacy and enhancing depression screening would be helpful to elevate treatment rates and improve depression care. Funding: This study was supported by a grant from the Ministry of Health and Welfare, Taiwan.

Indexed as

Depression careEffective coverageInitial contactTanahashi model

Identifiers

PMID36213135
PMCPMC9535419
OpenAlexW4281999320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.