ReviewFrontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology2022
Advances in non-invasive biosensing measures to monitor wound healing progression.
Review in Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
14 citing papers in PubMed.
- Lignin Nanoparticles Containing Cobalt-Cyanine Complexes: Potential Multifunctional Platforms for Photoacoustic Imaging and Photothermal Treatment of Bacterial Biofilms in Chronic Wounds.Macromolecular bioscience · 2026Article
- Revealing the promising era of silk-based nanotherapeutics: a ray of hope for chronic wound healing treatment.Naunyn-Schmiedeberg's archives of pharmacology · 2025Review
- MXenes in the application of diabetic foot: mechanisms, therapeutic implications and future perspectives.Journal of materials science. Materials in medicine · 2025Review
- An Investigation into the Structure of Wound-Healing Materials, Chemical Materials, Nature-Based Materials, and Wound Monitoring.Biomimetics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- Biomechanical mechanism and clinical management progress of surgical wound tension.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Review
- A human-scale porcine fasciocutaneous and muscle flap model for the evaluation of ortho-plastic reconstructions of lower-limb defects.Journal of bone and joint infection · 2025Article
- Review
- Integration of Functional Polymers and Biosensors to Enhance Wound Healing.Advanced healthcare materials · 2024Review
- Enhancing Wound Healing: A Comprehensive Review of Sericin andMaterials (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- The biomechanics of wounds at physiologically relevant levels: Understanding skin's stress-shielding effect for the quantitative assessment of healing.Materials today. Bio · 2024Article
- Identifying and Validating Extracellular Matrix-Related Gene CTSH in Diabetic Foot Ulcer Using Bioinformatics and Machine Learning.Journal of inflammation research · 2024Article
- Blank Spots in the Map of Human Skin: The Challenge for Xenotransplantation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023Review
- GEO data mining identifies potential immune-related genes in hypertrophic scar and verities in a rabbit model.Heliyon · 2023Article
- A PIEZO-Gated Mechanotransduction Timing Window Governs Scar Commitment in Wound Healing.Wound repair and regeneration : official publication of the Wound Healing Society [and] the European Tissue Repair SocietyReview
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
10 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Impaired wound healing is a significant financial and medical burden. The synthesis and deposition of extracellular matrix (ECM) in a new wound is a dynamic process that is constantly changing and adapting to the biochemical and biomechanical signaling from the extracellular microenvironments of the wound. This drives either a regenerative or fibrotic and scar-forming healing outcome. Disruptions in ECM deposition, structure, and composition lead to impaired healing in diseased states, such as in diabetes. Valid measures of the principal determinants of successful ECM deposition and wound healing include lack of bacterial contamination, good tissue perfusion, and reduced mechanical injury and strain. These measures are used by wound-care providers to intervene upon the healing wound to steer healing toward a more functional phenotype with improved structural integrity and healing outcomes and to prevent adverse wound developments. In this review, we discuss bioengineering advances in 1) non-invasive detection of biologic and physiologic factors of the healing wound, 2) visualizing and modeling the ECM, and 3) computational tools that efficiently evaluate the complex data acquired from the wounds based on basic science, preclinical, translational and clinical studies, that would allow us to prognosticate healing outcomes and intervene effectively. We focus on bioelectronics and biologic interfaces of the sensors and actuators for real time biosensing and actuation of the tissues. We also discuss high-resolution, advanced imaging techniques, which go beyond traditional confocal and fluorescence microscopy to visualize microscopic details of the composition of the wound matrix, linearity of collagen, and live tracking of components within the wound microenvironment. Computational modeling of the wound matrix, including partial differential equation datasets as well as machine learning models that can serve as powerful tools for physicians to guide their decision-making process are discussed.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.