ArticleJournal of environmental and public health2022
Human-Computer Interaction Environment Monitoring and Collaborative Translation Mode Exploration Using Artificial Intelligence Technology.
Article in Journal of environmental and public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It has been retracted, and should not be counted. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Retracted: Human-Computer Interaction Environment Monitoring and Collaborative Translation Mode Exploration Using Artificial Intelligence Technology.Journal of environmental and public health · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
- Retraction · 2023-11-29Compromised Peer Review · Investigation by Journal/Publisher · Investigation by Third Party · Paper Mill · Unreliable Results and/or Conclusions ·
- Retracted
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Artificial intelligence now plays a significant role in both daily life and scientific research because of the rapid advancement of this technology in recent years. Making full use of the phrases in the translation phrase table for translation is challenging since the phrase matching is too accurate when the translation machine decodes. Fully automatic machine translation struggles to meet the expectations of its users since there are more or less translation faults brought on by data bottlenecks. Therefore, we require collaborative assisted translation technology for human-computer interaction. This work strengthens the research on collaborative translation techniques and ways for monitoring the human-computer interaction environment in order to further improve translation quality. This essay investigates and discusses human-computer translation techniques as well as related ideas in collaborative translation and human-computer interaction. The translation similarity model is incorporated into the translation system model together with an overall qualitative knowledge and logical reasoning capability of human-computer interaction to offer fresh strategies and methods for collaborative translation between humans and computers. According to the experimental findings, the accuracy rate of the collaborative translation system for human-computer interaction based on artificial intelligence technology can achieve 98.2% and 95.6%. The quality of the translation is enhanced after human-computer interaction, and the editing gap between the incorrect and auxiliary translations is narrowed, demonstrating the efficiency of the system and demonstrating its viability. In order to enhance the accuracy of system translation and the effectiveness of system operation, it is important to investigate the collaborative translation mode of human-computer interaction based on artificial intelligence technology.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.