Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212904›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in global women's health2022

Prevalence, indications, and outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries among mothers who gave birth in Ethiopia: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Bikila Balis, Adera Debella, Indeshaw Ketema, Bajrond Eshetu, Ebisa Zerihun, Alemayehu Deressa Wayesa, Sisay Habte, Adisu Alemu, Habtamu Bekele

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in global women's health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 28% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 4 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Bikila BalisSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Adera DebellaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Indeshaw KetemaSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Bajrond EshetuSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Ebisa ZerihunDepartment of Nursing, College of Health Science, Oda Bultum University, Chiro, Ethiopia.
Alemayehu Deressa WayesaSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Sisay HabteSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Adisu AlemuSchool of Public Health, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Habtamu BekeleSchool of Nursing and Midwifery, College of Health and Medical Sciences, Haramaya University, Harar, Ethiopia.
Haramaya University · ET

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Operative vaginal deliveries represent an alternative to address problems during the second stage of labor. Clinicians have access to two different instruments obstetrics forceps and vacuum which should be conducted with indication. Understanding the pooled prevalence of operative vaginal deliveries, its indications, and outcomes would help in adopting suitable measures to reduce operative vaginal deliveries-related maternal and neonatal complications. Therefore, this systematic review and meta-analysis aimed to determine the prevalence, indications, and outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries among mothers who gave birth in Ethiopia. Methods: A literature search was done through databases such as PubMed, SCOPUS, Web of Sciences, CAB Abstract, and CINHAL (EBSCO) to search studies that have been conducted in Ethiopia. Relevant sources were consulted to retrieve unpublished studies. Original observational studies that reported the prevalence, indication and outcomes of operative vaginal deliveries conducted in the English language were identified and screened. Studies were independently assessed for inclusion, data extraction, and risk of bias. Results: Twelve studies were reviewed. The overall pooled prevalence of operative vaginal delivery among mothers who gave birth in Ethiopia was 10% (95% CI: 8 to 13) with Conclusion: This systematic review and meta-analysis showed one out of 10 mothers undergo operative vaginal deliveries. Almost all feto-maternal complications that arise following operative vaginal deliveries were preventable. Thus, concerned stakeholders should encourage quality OVDs practice by avoiding unnecessary indications and scaling up the skill of health professionals through special training. Systematic review registration: http://www.crd.york.ac.uk/PROSPERO/, identifier CRD42022311432.

Indexed as

instrumental deliveriesmeta-analysisobstetrics forcepsoperative vaginal deliveriessystematic reviewvacuum extractor

Identifiers

PMID36212904
PMCPMC9535624
OpenAlexW4296617614

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.