ArticleBioMed research international2022
Differentiating Glioblastoma Multiforme from Brain Metastases Using Multidimensional Radiomics Features Derived from MRI and Multiple Machine Learning Models.
Article in BioMed research international, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed, 18 citations in OpenAlex.
- The clinical implications and interpretability of computational medical imaging (radiomics) in brain tumors.Insights into imaging · 2025Review
- Artificial intelligence in the task of segmentation and classification of brain metastases images: current challenges and future opportunities.Frontiers in neurology · 2025Review
- Article
- Quantitative Physiologic MRI Combined with Feature Engineering for Developing Machine Learning-Based Prediction Models to Distinguish Glioblastomas from Single Brain Metastases.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiomics and Deep Features: Robust Classification of Brain Hemorrhages and Reproducibility Analysis Using a 3D Autoencoder Neural Network.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Article
- Radiological artificial intelligence - predicting personalized immunotherapy outcomes in lung cancer.NPJ precision oncology · 2023Review
- One Step Forward-The Current Role of Artificial Intelligence in Glioblastoma Imaging.Life (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Review
- Article
- The first case of glioma detected by an artificial intelligence algorithm running on real-time data in neurosurgery: illustrative case.Journal of neurosurgery. Case lessons · 2023Article
- Impact of Wavelet Kernels on Predictive Capability of Radiomic Features: A Case Study on COVID-19 Chest X-ray Images.Journal of imaging · 2023Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Due to different treatment strategies, it is extremely important to differentiate between glioblastoma multiforme (GBM) and brain metastases (MET). It often proves difficult to distinguish between GBM and MET using MRI due to their similar appearance on the imaging modalities. Surgical methods are still necessary for definitive diagnosis, despite the importance of magnetic resonance imaging in detecting, characterizing, and monitoring brain tumors. We introduced an accurate, convenient, and user-friendly method to differentiate between GBM and MET through routine MRI sequence and radiomics analyses. We collected 91 patients from one institution, including 50 with GBM and 41 with MET, which were proven pathologically. The tumors separately were segmented on all MRI images (T1-weighted imaging (T1WI), contrast-enhanced T1-weighted imaging (T1C), T2-weighted imaging (T2WI), and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery (FLAIR)) to form the volume of interest (VOI). Eight ML models and feature reduction strategies were evaluated using routine MRI sequences (T1W, T2W, T1-CE, and FLAIR) in two methods with (second model) and without wavelet transform (first model) radiomics. The optimal model was selected based on each model's accuracy, AUC-roc, and F1-score values. In this study, we have achieved the result of 0.98, 0.99, and 0.98 percent for accuracy, AUC-roc, and F1-score, respectively, which have yielded a better result than the first model. In most investigated models, there were significant improvements in the multidimensional wavelets model compared to the non-multidimensional wavelets model. Multidimensional discrete wavelet transform can analyze hidden features of the MRI from a different perspective and generate accurate features which are highly correlated with the model accuracy.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.