ArticleFrontiers in neurology2022
Phase I/II trial of local interstitial chemotherapy with arsenic trioxide in patients with newly diagnosed glioma.
Article in Frontiers in neurology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed, 7 citations in OpenAlex.
- Locoregional Delivery of miRNAs for Glioblastoma Treatment: A Systematic Review of Advances in Delivery Systems.Pharmaceutics · 2026Review
- Arsenic Trioxide and the MNK1 Inhibitor AUM001 Exert Synergistic Anti-Glioblastoma Effects by Modulating Key Translational, Cell Cycle, and Transmembrane Transport Pathways.Brain sciences · 2026Article
- Glioblastoma stem cells as carriers of tumour memory: a strategy for personalised immunotherapy using tumour-infiltrating lymphocytes.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Review
- Metabolic models predict fotemustine and the combination of eflornithine/rifamycin and adapalene/cannabidiol for the treatment of gliomas.Briefings in bioinformatics · 2024Article
- Peritumoral brain zone in glioblastoma: biological, clinical and mechanical features.Frontiers in immunology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
14 authors at 4 institutions in 2 countries.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Glioma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults with poor prognosis. The glioma patients benefit from STUPP strategy, including maximum and safe resection and adjuvant radiotherapy and chemotherapy. Arsenic trioxide could inhibit various tumors. However, it is a challenge to evaluate the efficiency and safety of srsenic trioxide in glioma patients. Objective: The arsenic trioxide has the potent therapeutic effect on glioma. However, the safety and efficacy of local interstitial chemotherapy with arsenic trioxide in newly diagnosed glioma patients is unclear. Methods: All patients received partial or complete tumor resection and intraoperative implantation of Ommaya reservoirs followed by standard radiotherapy. Arsenic trioxide with the starting dose 0.3 mg was administered Results: No hematological or grade 4 non-hematological toxicity was observed in any patient during arsenic trioxide treatment. The maximum tolerated dose of 1.5 mg of arsenic trioxide was safe and well tolerated. The median overall survival for WHO grade 3 glioma was 33.6 months, and for glioblastoma was 13.9 months. The median progression-free survival for WHO grade 2 glioma was 40.3 months, for grade 3 glioma was 21.5 months, and for glioblastoma was 9.5 months. Conclusion: These results suggest that arsenic trioxide is safe and well tolerated with local delivery into the tumor cavity of the brain, and the dose recommended for a phase II trial is 1.5 mg.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.