Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212616›Full record

ArticleJournal of oral biology and craniofacial research

Comparative evaluation of extrasinus versus intrasinus approach for zygomatic implant placement.

Deepika Kumari Jain, U S Pal, Shadab Mohammad, Divya Mehrotra, Ravi Katrolia, Saatvik Shandilya, Lakshya Yadav, Arunesh Kumar Tiwari

Erratum issued Registry-linked trialOpen access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of oral biology and craniofacial research. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. It is linked to trial NCT06129695 (Evaluation of Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla Utilizing Two Different Approaches), which is not on this map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
0.4field-weighted citation impact, top 40% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT06129695 nacompletednot on this map

Evaluation of Computer Guided Placement of Zygomatic Implants for Reconstruction of Atrophic Maxilla Utilizing Two Different Approaches: A Randomized Controlled Clinical Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorCairo UniversityRan2023 to 2026Enrolled10ConditionsAtrophic Maxilla, Zygomatic ImplantsArmsZygomatic implants
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed, 2 citations in OpenAlex.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Deepika Kumari JainDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
U S PalDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Shadab MohammadDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Divya MehrotraDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Ravi KatroliaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Saatvik ShandilyaDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Lakshya YadavDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
Arunesh Kumar TiwariDepartment of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, King George's Medical University, Lucknow, Uttar Pradesh, India.
King George's Medical University · IN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Edentulism, a common problem can occur either as a congenital defect or acquired later due to dental caries, periodontitis, as a consequence of aging, maxillofacial trauma or post-ablation in tumor resections. The rehabilitation of the missing teeth can be done using dental implants. To overcome the deficiency of available bone, processes like sinus augmentation with substituted bone graft and Le Fort I osteotomy with interpositional bone graft have been described in the literature. In order to overcome the associated limitations with these procedures, implants were designed that can be placed in specific anatomical areas like zygoma. This study aims to compare two different types of surgical approaches (Intrasinus vs Extrasinus) for the placement of zygomatic implants to treat atrophic maxilla. The placement of zygomatic implant through both extrasinus and intrasinus approaches were evaluated on the basis of different parameters and it was observed that postoperative pain and swelling was significantly found in intra sinus approach as compared to extra sinus approach. However, in the intranasal approach, poor patient compliance or low satisfaction rate was observed as compared to extra sinus approach. On the basis of the results of the study and post operative evaluation based on various criteria, it was concluded that extra sinus approach has got an edge over intra sinus approach.

Indexed as

Atrophic maxillaExtrasinusImplantsIntrasinusZygomatic implants

Identifiers

PMID36212616
PMCPMC9535122
OpenAlexW4295297423

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.