ArticleF&S reports2022
Cumulative live birth rate in women aged ≤37 years after in vitro fertilization with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology Clinic Outcome Reporting System retrospective analysis.
Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 13 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
13 citing papers in PubMed.
- Chronic endometritis and recurrent implantation failure: a narrative review of clinical relevance and diagnostic challenges.Reproduction & fertility · 2026Review
- Association between ovarian reserve and utilization of preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in autologous IVF cycles.Human reproduction open · 2026Article
- Article
- Comparative analysis of cumulative live birth rates in patients with recurrent pregnancy loss undergoing preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy versus conventional in vitro fertilisation/intracytoplasmic sperm injection: a retrospective study.Journal of ovarian research · 2025Article
- From live birth to live birth: a strong correlation between the outcomes of first and second frozen-thawed euploid blastocyst transfers from sibling oocytes.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- The clinical application and challenges of preimplantation genetic testing.Frontiers in genetics · 2025Review
- PGT-A: what's it for, what's wrong?Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2025Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients of different age: a systematic review and meta-analysis.Obstetrics & gynecology science · 2024Article
- Comparison of 1-year cumulative live birth and perinatal outcomes following single blastocyst transfer with or without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy: a propensity score-matched study.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Novel embryo selection strategies-finding the right balance.Frontiers in reproductive health · 2023Article
- PGT-A is associated with reduced cumulative live birth rate in first reported IVF stimulation cycles age ≤ 40: an analysis of 133,494 autologous cycles reported to SART CORS.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2023Article
- Preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy in patients under 37: easy come, easy go.F&S reports · 2022Article
- A Prospective Study on Clinical Utility of Preimplantation Genetic Testing for Aneuploidy and Structural Rearrangement Under Advanced Medical Care B in Japan.Reproductive medicine and biologyArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To investigate cumulative live birth rates (CLBRs) in cycles with and without preimplantation genetic testing for aneuploidy (PGT-A) among patients aged <35 and 35-37 years. Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Society for Assisted Reproductive Technology reporting clinics. Patients: A total of 31,900 patients aged ≤ 37 years with initial oocyte retrievals between January 2014 and December 2015 followed through December 2016. Interventions: None. Main outcome measures: The primary outcome was CLBR among patients aged <35 and 35-37 years. The secondary outcomes included multifetal births, miscarriage, preterm birth, perinatal mortality, and the time to pregnancy resulting in a live birth. Adjusted odds ratios (aORs) adjusting for age, body mass index, total 2 pronuclei embryos, embryos transferred, and follow-up timeframe. Results: Among patients aged <35 years, PGT-A was associated with reduced CLBRs (70.6% vs. 71.1%; aOR, 0.82; 95% CI [confidence interval], 0.72-0.93). No association was found between PGT-A and CLBRs among patients aged 35-37 years (66.6% vs. 62.5%; aOR, 0.92; 95% CI, 0.83-1.01). Overall, there was no significant difference in the miscarriage rate (aOR, 0.97; 95% CI, 0.82-1.14). Multifetal birth rates were lower with PGT-A (9.5% vs. 23.1%); however, PGT-A was not an independent predictor of multifetal birth (aOR, 1.11; 95% CI, 0.91-1.36). The average time to pregnancy resulting in a live birth was 2.37 months (SD 3.20) for untested transfers vs. 4.58 months (SD 3.53) for PGT-A transfers. Conclusions: In women aged <35, the CLBR was lower with PGT-A than with the transfer of untested embryos. In women aged 35-37 years, PGT-A did not improve CLBRs.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.