ArticleF&S reports2022
Implications of triclosan for female fertility: results from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey, 2013-2016.
Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed, 8 citations in OpenAlex.
- Dietary and lifestyle-related factors behind delayed conception in females.Food science & nutrition · 2024Review
- Association of triclosan and human infertility: A systematic review.Environmental analysis, health and toxicology · 2023Article
- Review
- Why Is Longevity Still a Scientific Mystery? Sirtuins-Past, Present and Future.International journal of molecular sciences · 2022Review
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
Abstract
Objective: To examine and further characterize the association between urinary levels of triclosan (TCS), a ubiquitous putative endocrine-disrupting chemical, and the risk of infertility. Design: A retrospective cross-sectional study using the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention's National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey. Setting: Not applicable. Patients: Female participants in the United States who completed the reproductive health questionnaire and provided urine samples for TCS level measurement from 2013 to 2016. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Rates of presumed infertility based on participants' affirmative response to survey question RHQ074 ("Have you ever attempted to become pregnant over a period of at least a year without becoming pregnant?"). Results: A total of 11.7% of the overall female and 12.5% of the eligible study population met the criterion for presumed infertility. Creatinine-adjusted urinary TCS levels were significantly higher among those meeting the criterion for infertility compared with the levels among those who did not. On multivariable-adjusted analyses, individuals with undetectable levels of urinary TCS were 35% less likely to meet the specified infertility criterion compared with those with detectable TCS levels. The magnitude of association between TCS levels and infertility was strongest when comparing the lowest and highest quartiles. The directionality and magnitude of the relationship between TCS levels and infertility were maintained on age-restricted and weighted analyses; however, the associations did not retain statistical significance. Conclusions: In a nationally representative sample of women in the United States, an association between TCS exposure and inability to conceive over a period of 1 year is suggested by our analysis of the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey data. The data infer a dose-response relationship.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.