ArticleF&S reports2022
In vitro fertilization cycle and embryo transfer outcomes in oligoanovulatory patients with hypothalamic hypogonadism vs. polycystic ovary syndrome and compared with normo-ovulatory patients.
Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Association of WEE2 Gene Polymorphism with Fertilization Failure in Women Undergoing Intracytoplasmic Sperm Injection.International journal of women's health · 2025Article
- ICSI and PGT-A in PCOS phenotype-D patients: a matched case-control study versus idiopathic infertile women.Journal of assisted reproduction and genetics · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: To study the difference in the live birth rates between anovulatory women with hypothalamic hypogonadism (HH) and those with polycystic ovary syndrome (PCOS) and normo-ovulatory women undergoing fresh embryo transfer or frozen embryo transfer (FET). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: Academic medical center. Patients: Patients with oligoanovulation (HH, n = 47; PCOS, n = 533) and normo-ovulation (tubal factor infertility, n = 399) undergoing in vitro fertilization and intracytoplasmic sperm injection cycles from January 1, 2012, to June 30, 2019. Interventions: None. Main Outcome Measures: Live birth rate. Results: Patients with HH had longer stimulation durations than both patients with PCOS and tubal factor infertility. Patients with HH had fewer oocytes retrieved than patients with PCOS, but their numbers of blastocysts were similar. Patients with HH and tubal factor infertility had similar numbers of oocytes retrieved and blastocysts. In fresh embryo transfer cycles, the live birth rates were similar among patients with HH, PCOS, and tubal factor infertility (37.5% vs. 37.1% vs. 29.3%, respectively). When evaluating FET cycles, patients with HH had lower live birth rates than patients with PCOS (26.5% vs. 46.7%) and tubal factor infertility (42.6%). Conclusions: Live birth rates are similar among patients with HH, PCOS, and normo-ovulation undergoing fresh embryo transfer but are significantly lower in women with HH undergoing FET.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.