Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212555›Full record

ArticleF&S reports2022

Incidence and risk factors of intrauterine adhesions after myomectomy.

Pietro Bortoletto, Kimberly W Keefe, Emily Unger, Eduardo Hariton, Antonio R Gargiulo

Registry-linked trialAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in F&S reports, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT07280286 (Incidence of Intrauterine Adhesions Following Myomectomies With the Use of an Intrauterine Anti-adhesion Gel), which is not on this map. Cited by 12 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT07280286 nanot yet recruitingnot on this mapstarted 2025, after this paper: background citation

Incidence of Intrauterine Adhesions Following Myomectomies With the Use of an Intrauterine Anti-adhesion Gel

TypeinterventionalSponsorFederico II UniversityRan2025 to 2028Enrolled62ConditionsMyoma, Uterus, Adhesion, Uterus, InternalArmsWomen will receive the application of an anti-adhesion gel at the end of the myomectomy procedure
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Review
  11. Article
  12. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Pietro BortolettoRonald O. Perelman and Claudia Cohen Center for Reproductive Medicine, Weill Cornell Medical College, New York, New York.
Kimberly W KeefeDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.
Emily UngerDepartment of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Washington, Seattle, Washington.
Eduardo HaritonDepartment of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of California, San Francisco, San Francisco, California.
Antonio R GargiuloDivision of Reproductive Endocrinology and Infertility, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology, and Reproductive Biology, Harvard Medical School, Brigham and Women's Hospital, Boston, Massachusetts.

Funding

Medical Scientist Training ProgramT32GM007753 · NIGMS · HARVARD UNIVERSITY (MEDICAL SCHOOL) · PI WALENSKY, LOREN DAVID · 1985 to 2021
$50.0M
MD-PhD Training Program in Aging and the Social/Behavioral SciencesT32AG051108 · NIA · HARVARD MEDICAL SCHOOL · PI MCWILLIAMS, JOHN MICHAEL · 2015 to 2025
$2.1M
NIA NIH HHS T32 AG051108NIGMS NIH HHS T32 GM007753
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To determine the incidence and risk factors for intrauterine adhesions (IUAs) after minimally invasive and open myomectomy and hysteroscopic myomectomy (HM). Design: Retrospective cohort study. Setting: University-affiliated fertility center. Patients: Patients aged ≥18 years undergoing robotic-assisted or conventional laparoscopic minimally invasive myomectomy, abdominal myomectomy, or HM between January 2007 and January 2017. Only patients who underwent uterine cavity evaluation within 12 months of surgery via hysteroscopy or hysterosalpingography were included. Patients were excluded if they had a history of IUA before myomectomy. Interventions: Not applicable. Main Outcome Measures: The primary outcomes of this study were the presence and severity of IUA. The secondary outcomes were the identification of risk factors for IUA formation. The severity of IUAs was scored by 2 investigators using a previously published grading system by March et al. Results: Of 1,315 patients who underwent myomectomy, 173 (13.2%) met the inclusion criteria. Intrauterine adhesions were identified in 9.3% of all patients, 75.0% of which were classified as minimal. The incidence of IUA did not vary by modality: 8.6%, minimally invasive myomectomy; 7.8%, abdominal myomectomy; and 11.8%, HM. There were no differences in incidence of IUA by the number or size of fibroids removed. Of patients with IUA, 87.5% had submucosal fibroids resected compared with 58.6% without IUA. Conclusions: The incidence of postoperative IUA in women undergoing myomectomy of any modality is relatively low (9.3%) and does not vary by modality alone. Most IUAs are of minimal degree. The presence of submucosal fibroids is associated with an increased risk of IUA in all modalities.

Indexed as

hysteroscopyIntrauterine adhesionslaparoscopymyomectomyrobotic surgery

Identifiers

PMID36212555
PMCPMC9532880

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.