Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212455›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in oncology2022

MRI radiomics-based machine learning model integrated with clinic-radiological features for preoperative differentiation of sinonasal inverted papilloma and malignant sinonasal tumors.

Jinming Gu, Qiang Yu, Quanjiang Li, Juan Peng, Fajin Lv, Beibei Gong, Xiaodi Zhang

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers, 2 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
12citing papers in PubMed, 2 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

12 citing papers in PubMed, 2 syntheses or guidelines pooled it.

  1. Artificial intelligence and MRI in sinonasal tumors discrimination: where do we stand?European archives of oto-rhino-laryngology : official journal of the European Federation of Oto-Rhino-Laryngological Societies (EUFOS) : affiliated with the German Society for Oto-Rhino-Laryngology - Head and Neck Surgery · 2025
    Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Jinming GuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Qiang YuDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Quanjiang LiDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Juan PengDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Fajin LvDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Beibei GongDepartment of Radiology, The First Affiliated Hospital of Chongqing Medical University, Chongqing, China.
Xiaodi ZhangDepartment of Clinical Science, Philips Healthcare, Chengdu, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: To explore the best MRI radiomics-based machine learning model for differentiation of sinonasal inverted papilloma (SNIP) and malignant sinonasal tumor (MST), and investigate whether the combination of radiomics features and clinic-radiological features can produce a superior diagnostic performance. Methods: The database of 247 patients with SNIP (n=106) or MST (n=141) were analyzed. Dataset from scanner A were randomly divided into training set (n=135) and test set 1 (n=58) in a ratio of 7:3, and dataset from scanner B and C were used as an additional independent test set 2 (n=54). Fourteen clinic-radiological features were analyzed by using univariate analysis, and those with significant differences were applied to construct clinical model. Based on the radiomics features extracted from single sequence (T2WI or CE-T1WI) and combined sequence, four commonly used classifiers (logistic regression (LR), support vector machine (SVM), decision tree (DT) and k-nearest neighbor (KNN)) were employed to constitute twelve different machine learning models, and the best-performing one was confirmed as the optimal radiomics model. Furthermore, a combined model incorporated best radiomics feature subsets and clinic-radiological features was developed. The diagnostic performances of these models were assessed by the area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curve (AUC) and the calibration curves. Results: Five clinic-radiological features (age, convoluted cerebriform pattern sign, heterogeneity, adjacent bone involvement and infiltration of surrounding tissue) were considered to be significantly different between the tumor groups ( Conclusion: The machine learning model based on T2WI sequence and SVM classifier achieved best performance in differentiation of SNIP and MST, and the combination of radiomics features and clinic-radiological features significantly improved the diagnostic capability of the model.

Indexed as

differential diagnosismachine learningmagnetic resonance imagingmalignant sinonasal tumorradiomicssinonasal inverted papilloma

Identifiers

PMID36212455
PMCPMC9538572

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.