Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212393›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in oncology2022

Successes and failures of angiogenesis blockade in gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma.

Massimiliano Salati, Francesco Caputo, Alessandro Bocconi, Sara Cerri, Cinzia Baldessari, Federico Piacentini, Massimo Dominici, Fabio Gelsomino

Open access · goldAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in oncology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
2.0field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Chalcones and Gastrointestinal Cancers: Experimental Evidence.International journal of molecular sciences · 2023
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Massimiliano SalatiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Francesco CaputoDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Alessandro BocconiDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Sara CerriDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Cinzia BaldessariDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Federico PiacentiniDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Massimo DominiciDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
Fabio GelsominoDivision of Oncology, Department of Oncology and Hematology, University Hospital of Modena, Modena, Italy.
University of Modena and Reggio Emilia · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Gastric and gastro-esophageal junction adenocarcinoma (GEA) remains a considerable major public health problem worldwide, being the fifth most common cancer with a fatality-to-case ratio that stands still at 70%. Angiogenesis, which is a well-established cancer hallmark, exerts a fundamental role in cancer initiation and progression and its targeting has been actively pursued as a promising therapeutic strategy in GEA. A wealth of clinical trials has been conducted, investigating anti-angiogenic agents including VEGF-directed monoclonal antibodies, small molecules tyrosine kinase inhibitors and VEGF-Trap agents both in the resectable and advanced setting, reporting controversial results. While phase III randomized trials testing the anti-VEGFR-2 antibody Ramucirumab and the selective VEGFR-2 tyrosine kinase inhibitor Apatinib demonstrated a significant survival benefit in later lines, the shift of angiogenesis inhibitors in the perioperative and first-line setting failed to improve patients' outcome in GEAs. The molecular landscape of disease, together with novel combinatorial strategies and biomarker-selected approaches are under investigation as key elements to the success of angiogenesis blockade in GEA. In this article, we critically review the existing literature on the biological rationale and clinical development of antiangiogenic agents in GEA, discussing major achievements, limitations and future developments, aiming at fully realizing the potential of this therapeutic approach.

Indexed as

angiogenesisclinical trialsgastric cancergastro-esophageal adenocarcinomaprecision medicinetargeted therapy

Identifiers

PMID36212393
PMCPMC9540203
OpenAlexW4296824571

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.