Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212200›Full record

ArticleJournal of medical physics

Reduction of Metal Artifacts Caused by Titanium Peduncular Screws in the Spine by Means of Monoenergetic Images and the Metal Artifact Reduction Software in Dual-Energy Computed Tomography.

Luca Ceccarelli, Giulio Vara, Federico Ponti, Marco Miceli, Rita Golfieri, Giancarlo Facchini

Open access · diamondAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of medical physics. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
7citing papers in PubMed
0.7field-weighted citation impact, top 35% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

7 citing papers in PubMed, 10 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Review
  7. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Luca CeccarelliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Giulio VaraDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Federico PontiDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Marco MiceliDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Rita GolfieriDepartment of Radiology, IRCCS Azienda Ospedaliero-Universitaria Di Bologna, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Giancarlo FacchiniDepartment of Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli, Via Albertoni, Bologna, Italy.
Istituto Ortopedico Rizzoli · ITAzienda USL di Bologna · IT

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: To evaluate the reduction of metal artifacts in patients with titanium peduncular screws in the spine using (1) conventional images (CI), (2) virtual monoenergetic reconstructions (VMRs), and (3) VMR + Metal Artifact Reduction Software (VMR + MARS), with dual-energy computed tomography (DECT). Materials and Methods: Twenty-four patients with titanium peduncular screws in the spine were studied using a 64-channel DECT. During the postprocessing phase, the CI, the VMRs from 100 to 140 keV, and the VMR at 140 keV + MARS were synthesized. All the images were considered, and a quantitative evaluation was performed measuring the attenuation values (in terms of Hounsfield Units) with region of interest, in correspondence with the most hyperdense and hypodense artifacts. All the values were then compared. A qualitative evaluation, in terms of image quality and extent of artifacts, was also performed by two radiologists. Results: In quantitative terms, the 140 keV + MARS reconstruction was able to significantly reduce both bright and dark metal artifacts, compared to CI and to VMRs. The VMR was capable of significantly reducing both dark and bright artifacts, compared to CI. In qualitative terms, the VMR at 140 keV proved to be the best, compared to CI and VMR + MARS images. Conclusions: The VMR + MARS image reduces metal artifacts from titanium peduncular screws more than VMRs alone and CI. Furthermore, the VMR can decrease metal artifacts from a quantitative and a qualitative point of view. Combining information from VMRs and VMR + MARS images could be the best way to solve the issue of metal artifacts on computed tomography images.

Indexed as

Artifactsbeam hardeningdual energy

Identifiers

PMID36212200
PMCPMC9543003
OpenAlexW4289841080

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-SA
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.