Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36212134›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in genetics2022

Evaluation of GENESIS, SAIGE, REGENIE and fastGWA-GLMM for genome-wide association studies of binary traits in correlated data.

Anastasia Gurinovich, Mengze Li, Anastasia Leshchyk, Harold Bae, Zeyuan Song, Konstantin G Arbeev, Marianne Nygaard, Mary F Feitosa, Thomas T Perls, Paola Sebastiani

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in genetics, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Genome scan reveals several loci associated with torus palatinus.Orthodontics & craniofacial research · 2025
    Article
  7. Cross-platform proteomics signatures of extreme old age.bioRxiv : the preprint server for biology · 2024
    Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Anastasia GurinovichInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.
Mengze LiBioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Anastasia LeshchykBioinformatics Program, Boston University, Boston, MA, United States.
Harold BaeBiostatistics Program, College of Public Health and Human Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, OR, United States.
Zeyuan SongDepartment of Biostatistics, Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, MA, United States.
Konstantin G ArbeevBiodemography of Aging Research Unit, Social Science Research Institute, Duke University, Durham, NC, United States.
Marianne NygaardEpidemiology, Biostatistics and Biodemography, Department of Public Health, University of Southern Denmark, Odense, Denmark.
Mary F FeitosaDivision of Statistical Genomics, Department of Genetics, Washington University School of Medicine, St Louis, MO, United States.
Thomas T PerlsDepartment of Medicine, Geriatrics Section, Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, MA, United States.
Paola SebastianiInstitute for Clinical Research and Health Policy Studies, Tufts Medical Center, Boston, MA, United States.

Funding

The Long Life Family StudyU19AG063893 · NIA · WASHINGTON UNIVERSITY · PI Stacy Andersen, KAARE CHRISTENSEN · 2019 to 2026
$125.4M
Systems BiologyU19AG023122 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI FRED H GAGE · 2004 to 2026
$102.6M
Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH3AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2022 to 2025
$14.7M
Identifying protective omics profiles in centenarians and translating these into preventive and therapeutic strategiesUH2AG064704 · NIA · BOSTON UNIVERSITY MEDICAL CAMPUS · PI PERLS, THOMAS T, SEBASTIANI, PAOLA · 2019 to 2021
$9.4M
Integrative Omics to enhance therapeutics development for healthy agingUH3AG064706 · NIA · TRANSLATIONAL GENOMICS RESEARCH INST · PI MILLER, RICHARD A, SCHORK, NICHOLAS JOSEPH · 2021 to 2024
$3.3M
NIA NIH HHS U19 AG023122NIA NIH HHS U19 AG063893NIA NIH HHS UH2 AG064704NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG064704NIA NIH HHS UH3 AG064706
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Performing a genome-wide association study (GWAS) with a binary phenotype using family data is a challenging task. Using linear mixed effects models is typically unsuitable for binary traits, and numerical approximations of the likelihood function may not work well with rare genetic variants with small counts. Additionally, imbalance in the case-control ratios poses challenges as traditional statistical methods such as the Score test or Wald test perform poorly in this setting. In the last couple of years, several methods have been proposed to better approximate the likelihood function of a mixed effects logistic regression model that uses Saddle Point Approximation (SPA). SPA adjustment has recently been implemented in multiple software, including GENESIS, SAIGE, REGENIE and fastGWA-GLMM: four increasingly popular tools to perform GWAS of binary traits. We compare Score and SPA tests using real family data to evaluate computational efficiency and the agreement of the results. Additionally, we compare various ways to adjust for family relatedness, such as sparse and full genetic relationship matrices (GRM) and polygenic effect estimates. We use the New England Centenarian Study imputed genotype data and the Long Life Family Study whole-genome sequencing data and the binary phenotype of human extreme longevity to compare the agreement of the results and tools' computational performance. The evaluation suggests that REGENIE might not be a good choice when analyzing correlated data of a small size. fastGWA-GLMM is the most computationally efficient compared to the other three tools, but it appears to be overly conservative when applied to family-based data. GENESIS, SAIGE and fastGWA-GLMM produced similar, although not identical, results, with SPA adjustment performing better than Score tests. Our evaluation also demonstrates the importance of adjusting by full GRM in highly correlated datasets when using GENESIS or SAIGE.

Indexed as

binary phenotypecorrelated datafastGWA-GLMMGENESISGWASREGENIESAIGESPA

Identifiers

PMID36212134
PMCPMC9544087

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.