ArticleiScience2022
Developmental eye motion plasticity after unilateral embryonic ear removal in
Article in iScience, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed, 3 citations in OpenAlex.
- Influence of semicircular canal morphology on the VOR and swimming activity in larval amphibians: a comparative study inFrontiers in neurology · 2025Article
- Bilateral Retinofugal Pathfinding Impairments Limit Behavioral Compensation in Near-Congenital One-EyedeNeuro · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Gaze stabilization relies on bilateral mirror-symmetric vestibular endorgans, central circuits, and extraocular motor effectors. Embryonic removal of one inner ear before the formation of these structures was used to evaluate the extent to which motor outputs in the presence of a singular inner ear can develop. Near-congenital one-eared tadpoles subjected to separate or combinatorial visuo-vestibular motion stimulation exhibited comparable eye movements, though smaller in gain to controls, whereas isolated visuo-motor responses were unaltered. Surprisingly, vestibulo-ocular reflexes were robust during off-direction motion toward the missing ear in most cases and often attenuated during on-direction motion. This bidirectional plasticity of signal encoding appears to occur at the expense of vestibular reflexes during motion in the normally preferential activation direction of the singular ear. Consequently, formation of central vestibulo-motor circuits in one-eared animals likely relies on multi-neuronal homeostatic strategies, including enhanced afferent fiber activity in the attempt to adjust bilateral sensorimotor transformations.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.