ArticleDigital health
Artificial intelligence healthcare service resources adoption by medical institutions based on TOE framework.
Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 19 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
19 citing papers in PubMed, 68 citations in OpenAlex.
- Advancing foundational models in digital health technology adoption: A systematic literature review of multidisciplinary factors.PLOS digital health · 2026Article
- Understanding surgeon adoption of artificial intelligence surgical technology: integrating UTAUT-TOE model.Journal of robotic surgery · 2026Article
- Research on the path of high-quality development of the smart health and aging care industry driven by digital economy- dynamic QCA analysis based on TOE framework.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- AI readiness for molecular precision medicine supply chains: evidence from Saudi Arabia.Frontiers in digital health · 2026Article
- Artificial intelligence in interventional cardiology: a review of its role in diagnosis, decision-making, and procedural precision.Annals of medicine and surgery (2012) · 2025Review
- Establishing organizational AI governance in healthcare: a case study in Canada.NPJ digital medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of digital health technologies adoption on healthcare workers' performance and workload: perspective with DOI and TOE models.BMC health services research · 2025Article
- How to promote university technology transfer? A configuration analysis based on technology, organization and environment framework.PloS one · 2025Article
- Barriers to and Facilitators of Artificial Intelligence Adoption in Health Care: Scoping Review.JMIR human factors · 2024Article
- Article
- Leadership for AI Transformation in Health Care Organization: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2024Article
- Assessing the Impact of AI Education on Hispanic Healthcare Professionals' Perceptions and Knowledge.Education sciences · 2024Article
- The Role of Artificial Intelligence in Improving Patient Outcomes and Future of Healthcare Delivery in Cardiology: A Narrative Review of the Literature.Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland) · 2024Review
- Computer Skills and Electronic Health Records (EHRs) in a State Tertiary Hospital in Southwest Nigeria.Epidemiologia (Basel, Switzerland) · 2023Article
- Impact of perceived ease of use, organizational support mechanism, and industry competitive pressure on physicians' use of liver cancer screening technology in medical alliances.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Theoretical appraisal of explanatory paradigms for artificial intelligence usage by medical doctors.Digital healthReview
- Article
- How can physicians adopt AI-based applications in the United Arab Emirates to improve patient outcomes?Digital healthArticle
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors at 3 institutions in 1 country.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objectives: This study used the Technology-Organization-Environment (TOE) framework to identify the factors involved in the decisions made by integrated medical and healthcare organizations to adopt artificial intelligence (AI) elderly care service resources. Method: This study identified the Decision-making Trial and Evaluation Laboratory-Interpretive Structural Modeling (DEMATEL-ISM) method was used to construct a multilayer recursive structural model and to analyze the interrelationships between the levels. A MICMAC quadrant diagram was used for a cluster analysis. Results: The ISM recursive structural model was divided into a total of seven layers. The bottom layer contained the four factors of High risk of data leakage (T1), Lack of awareness of the value and benefits of AI healthcare technology (T5), Lack of management leadership support (O1), and Government policies (E1). Having a low dependency but high driving force, these factors are the root causes of adoption by healthcare organizations. The topmost layer contained the most direct factors, which had a high dependency but the low driving force, influencing adoption: Competitive pressures (E2), Lack of patient trust (E5), and Lack of excellent partnerships (E7). Healthcare organizations are more concerned with technology and their environments when deciding to adopt intelligent healthcare resources. Conclusion: The combination of the three methods of DEMATEL-ISM-MICMAC construction models provides new ideas for smart healthcare services for hospitals. The DEMATEL method favors the construction dimension of the micro-model, while the ISM method favors the construction dimension of the macro-model. Combining these two methods may reduce the loss of information within the system, simplify the matrix calculation workload, and improve the efficiency of operations while decomposing the complex problems into several sub-problems in a more comprehensive and detailed way. Conducting cluster analysis of the adoption determinants utilizing MICMAC quadrant diagrams may provide strong methodological guidance and decision-making recommendations for government departments, senior decision-makers in healthcare organizations, and policy-makers in associations in the senior care industry.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.