Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211795›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of internet-based psychological interventions for healthcare workers with psychological distress: Study protocol for the RESPOND healthcare workers randomised controlled trial.

Roberto Mediavilla, Kerry R McGreevy, Mireia Felez-Nobrega, Anna Monistrol-Mula, María-Fe Bravo-Ortiz, Carmen Bayón, Beatriz Rodríguez-Vega, Pablo Nicaise, Audrey Delaire, Marit Sijbrandij and 15 more

Registry-linked trialOpen access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. It is linked to trial NCT04980326 (A Scalable Low-intensity Psychological Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers Involved in the First COVID-19 Outbreak in Spain), which is not on this map. Cited by 17 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
17citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

NCT04980326 nacompletednot on this map

A Scalable Low-intensity Psychological Intervention to Reduce Psychological Distress Among Healthcare Workers Involved in the First COVID-19 Outbreak in Spain: a Randomized Trial

TypeinterventionalSponsorInstituto de Investigación Hospital Universitario La PazRan2021 to 2022Enrolled232ConditionsPsychological Distress, Depression, AnxietyArmsDoing What Matters (DWM), Problem Management Plus (PM+), Psychological First Aid (PFA)
3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

17 citing papers in PubMed, 25 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Trial
  2. Trial
  3. Trial
  4. Article
  5. Observational
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

25 authors at 11 institutions in 8 countries.

Roberto MediavillaDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6411-9439
Kerry R McGreevyDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-5509-4820
Mireia Felez-NobregaCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
Anna Monistrol-MulaResearch and Development Unit, Parc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu, Barcelona, Spain.
María-Fe Bravo-OrtizDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7969-9245
Carmen BayónDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Beatriz Rodríguez-VegaDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
Pablo NicaiseInstitute of Health & Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Audrey DelaireInstitute of Health & Society (IRSS), Université Catholique de Louvain, Brussels, Belgium.
Marit SijbrandijClinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Anke B WitteveenClinical, Neuro- and Developmental Psychology, WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Amsterdam Public Health Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, the Netherlands.
Marianna PurgatoWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Corrado BarbuiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Federico TedeschiWHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Department of Neuroscience, Biomedicine, and Movement Sciences, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
Maria MelchiorSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Sociale (ERES), Faculté de Médecine St Antoine, , Paris, France.
Judith van der WaerdenSorbonne Université, INSERM, Institut Pierre Louis d'Epidémiologie et de Santé Publique (IPLESP), Equipe de Recherche en Epidémiologie Sociale (ERES), Faculté de Médecine St Antoine, , Paris, France.
David McDaidCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0744-2664
A-La ParkCare Policy and Evaluation Centre, Department of Health Policy, London School of Economics and Political Science, London, UK.
Raffael KalischLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
Papoula Petri-RomãoLeibniz Institute for Resilience Research (LIR), Mainz, Germany.
James UnderhillResearch consultant, Brighton, UK.
Richard A BryantSchool of Psychology, University of New South Wales, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
Josep Maria HaroCentro de Investigación Biomédica en Red de Salud Mental (CIBERSAM), Instituto de Salud Carlos III, Madrid, Spain.
José Luis Ayuso-MateosDepartment of Psychiatry, Universidad Autónoma de Madrid (UAM), Madrid, Spain.
RESPOND Consortium
Instituto de Salud Carlos III · ESHospital Universitario La Paz · ESUniversity of Verona · ITInserm · FRLondon School of Economics and Political Science · GBUCLouvain · BEVrije Universiteit Amsterdam · NLJohannes Gutenberg University Mainz · DELeibniz Institute for Resilience Research · DEParc Sanitari Sant Joan de Déu · ESUNSW Sydney · AU

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and aims: The coronavirus disease 2019 pandemic has challenged health services worldwide, with a worsening of healthcare workers' mental health within initial pandemic hotspots. In early 2022, the Omicron variant is spreading rapidly around the world. This study explores the effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of a stepped-care programme of scalable, internet-based psychological interventions for distressed health workers on self-reported anxiety and depression symptoms. Methods: We present the study protocol for a multicentre (two sites), parallel-group (1:1 allocation ratio), analyst-blinded, superiority, randomised controlled trial. Healthcare workers with psychological distress will be allocated either to care as usual only or to care as usual plus a stepped-care programme that includes two scalable psychological interventions developed by the World Health Organization: A guided self-help stress management guide (Doing What Matters in Times of Stress) and a five-session cognitive behavioural intervention (Problem Management Plus). All participants will receive a single-session emotional support intervention, namely psychological first aid. We will include 212 participants. An intention-to-treat analysis using linear mixed models will be conducted to explore the programme's effect on anxiety and depression symptoms, as measured by the Patient Health Questionnaire - Anxiety and Depression Scale summary score at 21 weeks from baseline. Secondary outcomes include post-traumatic stress disorder symptoms, resilience, quality of life, cost impact and cost-effectiveness. Conclusions: This study is the first randomised trial that combines two World Health Organization psychological interventions tailored for health workers into one stepped-care programme. Results will inform occupational and mental health prevention, treatment, and recovery strategies. Registration details: ClinicalTrials.gov Identifier: NCT04980326.

Indexed as

adjustment disordersanalysisanxietycoronavirus disease 2019costdepressionhealthcare facilitiesinternet-based interventionMeSH termspsychologicalpsychological distresspsychosocial interventionresilienceworkforce and services

Identifiers

PMID36211795
PMCPMC9537484
OpenAlexW4303645752

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.