ArticleFrontiers in public health2022
Influence of carbon emission trading policy on residents' health in China.
Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- The impact of carbon emissions trading scheme on residents' medical expenses: a test based on multi-period difference-in-differences method.BMC public health · 2026Article
- Mitigating environmental public health risks via artificial intelligence: mechanisms and boundary conditions.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- The impact of carbon emissions trading on green total factor productivity based on evidence from a quasi-natural experiment.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Evaluating the impact of Carbon Emission Trading Policy on pan-cancer incidence among middle-aged and elderly populations: a quasi-natural experiment.Environmental health and preventive medicine · 2025Article
- Impact of national health city campaign on public health in China.Frontiers in public health · 2025Article
- Green credit policy and residents' health: quasi-natural experimental evidence from China.Frontiers in public health · 2024Article
- Oxidative Potential Characterization of Different PMInternational journal of environmental research and public health · 2023Article
- Are non-competitors greener? The effect of consumer awareness differences on green food consumption.Frontiers in psychology · 2023Article
- Influence of public hospital reform on public health: Evidence from a quasi-natural experiment in China.Frontiers in public health · 2023Article
- Can Marketization of Environmental Governance Improve Public Health?-Empirical Analysis Based on the Emission Trading System.International journal of environmental research and public health · 2022Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
13 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Residents' health is the basic condition for economic and social development. At present, China's environmental pollution problem is becoming increasingly serious, which not only hinders sustainable economic and social development, but also poses a major threat to public health. Therefore, based on the carbon emissions trading policy implemented in China, this paper explores this policy's impact on residents' health using the DID model and illustrates the moderating effect of environmental pollution. The results show that (1) carbon emissions trading policies can promote the improvement of residents' health; (2) the effect is stronger for western regions and provinces with smaller population sizes after taking control variables into consideration; and (3) environmental pollution has a significant moderating effect on the relationship between carbon emissions trading and residents' health. This research serves as an important reference for expanding the scope of the policy pilot, reducing pollutant emissions, and improving the health of the population.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.