Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211649›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in public health2022

A cross-sectional study of knowledge, attitude, and practice toward COVID-19 in solid organ transplant recipients at a transplant center in the United States.

Lucas Wang, Mujahed Abualfoul, Hellen Oduor, Priyanka Acharya, Mingyang Cui, Anne Murray, Edward Dominguez, Mangesh Pagadala

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in public health, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 28 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
28citing papers in PubMed
4.8field-weighted citation impact, top 4% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

28 citing papers in PubMed, 32 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Article
  16. Article
  17. Article
  18. Article
  19. Article
  20. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

8 authors at 2 institutions in 1 country.

Lucas WangDepartment of Internal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Mujahed AbualfoulDepartment of Internal Medicine, Methodist Dallas Medical Center, Dallas, TX, United States.
Hellen OduorMethodist Dallas Medical Center, Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas, Dallas, TX, United States.
Priyanka AcharyaClinical Research Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Mingyang CuiClinical Research Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Anne MurrayClinical Research Institute, Methodist Health System, Dallas, TX, United States.
Edward DominguezMethodist Dallas Medical Center, Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas, Dallas, TX, United States.
Mangesh PagadalaMethodist Dallas Medical Center, Liver Institute at Methodist Dallas, Dallas, TX, United States.
Methodist Dallas Medical Center · USClinical Research Institute · US

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objectives: Knowledge, attitude, and practices (KAP) have been widely used during times of pandemic to quantify and locate gaps of care during pandemics. Using this tool, we can identify and target populations who underwent solid organ transplant (SOT) to bolster preventative practices in these patients during COVID-19. Materials and methods: An institution-based cross-sectional study was conducted between June 1, 2020 and June 30, 2021 on patients who underwent a liver and/or kidney transplant at Methodist Dallas Medical Center in Dallas, Texas, USA. A KAP questionnaire of 26 questions about COVID-19 was designed based on the clinical and community management guidelines published by the WHO. The participant's overall KAP was categorized using Bloom's cut-off point. A KAP domain was considered sufficient if the score was between 60 and 100% and insufficient if the score was <60%. The strength of association was assessed by using odds ratio (OR); only significant independent factors in each tested area were assessed. Results: Respondents with children in the household were less likely to have sufficient practices than those who did not [OR = 0.2491, 95% Confidence Interval (0.0893-0.6120), Conclusion: Our study found that knowledge and having children in the household correlated with higher levels of practice.

Indexed as

COVID-19Organ TransplantationChildCross-Sectional StudiesHealth Knowledge, Attitudes, PracticeHumansPandemicsUnited StatesattitudeCOVID-19health disparitiesimmunosuppressionkidney transplantknowledgeliver transplantpractices

Identifiers

PMID36211649
PMCPMC9539443
OpenAlexW4296836811

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.