Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211597›Full record

ArticleJournal of ophthalmology2022

Comparisons of Three Methods for Myopia Control in Adolescents.

Ling-Fang Du, Fang He, Hua-Xia Tan, Na Gao, Wei-Qiong Song, Yu-Xiu Luo

Open access · goldAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of ophthalmology, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 9 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
9citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
1.7field-weighted citation impact, top 15% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

9 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it, 13 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Review
  3. Comparison of Orthokeratology and Peripheral Defocus Spectacle Lenses in Myopia Control Using Multispectral Refractive Topography.Ophthalmic & physiological optics : the journal of the British College of Ophthalmic Opticians (Optometrists) · 2026
    Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Ling-Fang DuOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Fang HeOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-6397-1355
Hua-Xia TanOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Na GaoOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Wei-Qiong SongOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Yu-Xiu LuoOptometry Center, The First People's Hospital of Chen Zhou City, Chenzhou 423000, Hunan, China.
Chenzhou First People's Hospital · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: A rising trend in electronic use has increased the prevalence of myopia in adolescents, but the optimal approach to controlling myopia remains undetermined. Here, we explored the effects of common single vision (SV) spectacle lenses combined with 0.01% atropine eye drops (SV + A), orthokeratology (OK) lenses, and peripheral defocus (PD) spectacle lenses on myopia control in adolescents. Methods: Totally 150 myopic adolescent patients (300 eyes) receiving treatment at The First People's Hospital of Chenzhou City were enrolled. According to doctors' advice and guardians' wishes, the patients were divided into SV + A group, OK group, and PD group, with each group consisting of 50 cases (100 eyes). The spherical equivalent, axial length, accommodative response index (accommodative sensitivity and accommodative lag), and intraocular pressure were compared before and after 12 months of wearing lenses, and the complications were recorded. Results: Before wearing lenses, there was no statistical significance in baseline characteristics such as age, gender, and spherical equivalent among the three groups ( Conclusion: SV + A, OK, and PD lenses can effectively control the progression of myopia in adolescents, but SV + A and OK lenses exhibited more significant effects.

Identifiers

PMID36211597
PMCPMC9536993
OpenAlexW4297983704

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.