Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211579›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in cardiovascular medicine2022

A time-dependent offset field approach to simulating realistic interactions between beating hearts and surgical devices in virtual interventional radiology.

Haoyu Wang, Jianhuang Wu

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in cardiovascular medicine, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Haoyu WangShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.
Jianhuang WuShenzhen Institutes of Advanced Technology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Shenzhen, China.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Endovascular interventional radiology (IR) is a minimally invasive procedure for the treatment of vascular diseases. This procedure requires physicians to be highly skilled at manipulating interventional devices under the guidance of two-dimensional X-ray imaging. By offering a non-error-sensitive and radiation-free environment, a virtual reality-based simulator provides a promising alternative for surgical skills training and surgery planning. Building a realistic and interactive simulator is a challenging task. To achieve better realism, this paper proposes a novel method of simulating the heartbeat for both standard and patient-specific anatomical data. A time-dependent offset field approach is proposed to efficiently and stably simulate the interactive behavior between the dynamic heart mesh and surgical devices. For medical imaging simulation, we propose a GPU-based linear depth subtraction method to approximate fluoroscopic images based on the attenuation of the X-ray. On this basis, a topology-based flow map method is proposed to simulate the propagation of the contrast medium in angiography. Experimental results show that the proposed algorithm can simulate heartbeat stably for meshes with varying geometrical shapes and complexities. In efficiency, the dynamic heart mesh can interact with surgical devices stably at 60 frames/s. Under the simulated fluoroscopic imaging effect, the injected contrast medium can realistically visualize both dynamic and static vessels. In a face validity by medical students and clinicians, the category of effectiveness score 8.35 out of 10 on average, demonstrating that our simulator is useful in surgical skills training and surgery planning.

Indexed as

angiographyheartbeat simulationinterventional radiologyskills trainingsurgery planningvirtual reality

Identifiers

PMID36211579
PMCPMC9537555

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.