Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211500›Full record

SynthesisFrontiers in nutrition2022

Dietary meat mutagens intake and cancer risk: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Qie Reng, Ling Ling Zhu, Li Feng, Yong Jie Li, Yan Xing Zhu, Ting Ting Wang, Feng Jiang

Open access · goldAbstract readSystematic Review
In one paragraph

Synthesis in Frontiers in nutrition, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 11 papers, 3 of them syntheses that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
11citing papers in PubMed, 3 pooled it
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 13% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

11 citing papers in PubMed, 3 syntheses or guidelines pooled it, 14 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Pooled it
  3. Pooled it
  4. Article
  5. Review
  6. Review
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors at 5 institutions in 1 country.

Qie RengTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Ling Ling ZhuTaizhou Jiaojiang Maternal and Child Health Care Hospital, Taizhou, China.
Li FengGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Yong Jie LiCollege of Pharmacy, Shaoyang University, Shaoyang, China.
Yan Xing ZhuGuizhou Orthopedics Hospital, Guiyang, Guizhou, China.
Ting Ting WangTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Feng JiangTaizhou Central Hospital (Taizhou University Hospital), Taizhou, China.
Taizhou Central Hospital · CNGuizhou Cancer Hospital · CNGuizhou Provincial People's Hospital · CNShaoyang University · CNTaizhou University · CN

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Clinical and preclinical studies suggested that certain mutagens occurring as a reaction of creatine, amino acids, and sugar during the high temperature of cooking meat are involved in the pathogenesis of human cancer. Here we conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to examine whether meat mutagens [PhIP, MeIQx, DiMeIQx, total HCA, and B(a)P] present a risk factor for human cancer. Methods: We searched the following databases for relevant articles published from inception to 10 Oct 2021 with no language restrictions: Pubmed, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), Baidu Academic, Zhejiang Digital Library. Two independent researchers screened all titles and obtained eligible texts for further screening. Independent data extraction was conducted, and meta-analysis was carried out using random-effects models to calculate the risk ratio of the meat mutagens exposure. Results: A total of 1,786,410 participants and 70,653 cancer cases were identified. Among these, there were 12 different types of cancer at various sites, i.e., breast, bladder, colorectal, colon, rectum, prostate, lung, Non-Hodgkin lymphoma, kidney, gastric, esophagus, pancreatic, hepatocellular carcinoma. Cancer risk was significantly increased by intake of PhIP (OR = 1.13;95% CI 1.07-1.21; Conclusion: Meat mutagens of PhIP, MeIQx, DiMeIQx, and total HCA have a positive association with the risk of cancer. Systematic review registration: [www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero], identifier [CRD42022148856].

Indexed as

cancer riskheterocyclic amines (HCAs)meat mutagensmeta-analysispolycyclic aromatic amines (PAHs)

Identifiers

PMID36211500
PMCPMC9537819
OpenAlexW4297008359

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.