Evidence map›Paper›PMID 36211475›Full record

ArticleInternational journal of mass spectrometry2022

Separation methods in single-cell proteomics: RPLC or CE?

Kellye A Cupp-Sutton, Mulin Fang, Si Wu

Open access · greenAbstract read
In one paragraph

Article in International journal of mass spectrometry, 2022. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 15 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
15citing papers in PubMed
2.2field-weighted citation impact, top 12% of its field
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

15 citing papers in PubMed, 21 citations in OpenAlex.

  1. Review
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. Review
  9. Article
  10. Article
  11. Article
  12. Review
  13. Article
  14. Article
  15. Multidimensional Separations in Top-Down Proteomics.Analytical science advances · 2023
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors at 1 institution in 1 country.

Kellye A Cupp-SuttonDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
Mulin FangDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
Si WuDepartment of Chemistry and Biochemistry, University of Oklahoma, Norman, OK 73019.
University of Oklahoma · US

Funding

Translation of immunologic technologies from basic research into pre-clinical nonU19AI062629 · NIAID · OKLAHOMA MEDICAL RESEARCH FOUNDATION · PI COGGESHALL, KENNETH MARK · 2004 to 2023
$56.2M
Computational tools for top down mass spectrometry based proteoform identification and proteogenomicsR01GM118470 · NIGMS · TULANE UNIVERSITY OF LOUISIANA · PI Xiaowen Liu · 2016 to 2026
$2.7M
Quantitative Analysis of Serum Autoantibody Repertories in Systemic Lupus ErythematosusR01AI141625 · NIAID · UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA · PI SINGH, SHANTERI, SMITH, KENNETH MICHAEL · 2019 to 2023
$2.1M
NIAID NIH HHS R01 AI141625NIAID NIH HHS U19 AI062629NIGMS NIH HHS R01 GM118470
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Cellular heterogeneity is commonly investigated using single-cell genomics and transcriptomics to investigate biological questions such as disease mechanism, therapeutic screening, and genomic and transcriptomic diversity between cellular populations and subpopulations at the cellular level. Single-cell mass spectrometry (MS)-based proteomics enables the high-throughput examination of protein expression at the single-cell level with wide applicability, and with spatial and temporal resolution, applicable to the study of cellular development, disease, effect of treatment, etc. The study of single-cell proteomics has lagged behind genomics and transcriptomics largely because proteins from single-cell samples cannot be amplified as DNA and RNA can using well established techniques such as PCR. Therefore, analytical methods must be robust, reproducible, and sensitive enough to detect the very small amount of protein within a single cell. To this end, nearly every step of the proteomics process has been extensively altered and improved to facilitate the proteomics analysis of single cells including cell counting and sorting, lysis, protein digestion, sample cleanup, separation, MS data acquisition, and data analysis. Here, we have reviewed recent advances in single-cell protein separation using nano reversed phase liquid chromatography (nRPLC) and capillary electrophoresis (CE) to inform application driven selection of separation techniques in the laboratory setting.

Indexed as

capillary electrophoresis mass spectrometryreversed-phase liquid chromatographySingle-cell proteomics

Identifiers

PMID36211475
PMCPMC9542495
OpenAlexW4292341175

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceTDM
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.